2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability and measurement error of protractor-based goniometry of the fingers: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found mean improvement for various measures of range of motion over time. This improvement will probably not be clinically relevant as it is of the same magnitude as the measurement error of the goniometer [ 34 ]. However, the gain in patient-reported outcomes was not at the cost of the range of motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found mean improvement for various measures of range of motion over time. This improvement will probably not be clinically relevant as it is of the same magnitude as the measurement error of the goniometer [ 34 ]. However, the gain in patient-reported outcomes was not at the cost of the range of motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different definitions for recurrence greatly influence the reported recurrence rates. In addition, ROM lacks clarity in earlier research and there are different methods for measuring it [50, 53]. In the context of a consensus definition of DC recurrence, it is recommended to measure each joint separately [39].…”
Section: Discussion Of Methodological Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the COSMIN criteria [52], one systematic review found a limited level of evidence for an acceptable reliability in the dorsal measurement method of goniometry assessment of the finger joints, and an unknown level of evidence for the measurement error [53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, the use and reporting of ICCs between studies is inconsistent and often lacks sufficient detail. 2,16,17 Additionally, the SEM can be calculated as SEM= SD pooled x . 14 Hence, both the ICC and SEM are influenced by any changes that could influence the components of variance within the data.…”
Section: B Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%