The Relevance of Social Theory in the Practice of Environmental Management

Abstract

In this paper I argue that the dominance of certain paradigms and theories on policies can have an influence on the value added by impact assessments. A link exists between paradigms and theories and policies and consequently the practices humans develop to tackle real world problems. I also argue that different types of thinking (contained in paradigms and theories) need to be integrated, at least at the scientific level, to enhance our understanding of social phenomena. This in turn can have a positive influence on policy processes that follow impact assessment recommendations. I am not arguing for the adoption of theoretical positions by practitioners, Instead, I contend that if impact assessments are informed by a variety of paradigms and theories, the policy practitioner might have a better understanding of the issue and the moral choices he or she needs to make. I will highlight the connection between theory and policies with practical examples from the social impact assessment of the De Hoop Dam, which was constructed on the Steelpoort River. I also argue for an integration of different theories to give a deeper understanding of real world problems.

Navigating wicked water governance in the “solutionscape” of science, policy, practice, and participation

“…This may result in more diverse and inclusive policy recommendations, as opposed to limited policy interventions that are too rigid for non-stationary environments that can reproduce inequalities (Zeitoun et al 2016). Furthermore, more integrative approaches in water research that investigate the role of power and justice in institutional arrangements could support policy makers in broadening their understanding of wicked (water) problems (Cleaver 2012, 2018, Meissner 2016a, Cleaver and Whaley 2018.…”

“…This may perpetuate water deprivation as a central element of poverty, and a continued dependence on the "random goodwill of the state" (Wester 2008:170). The role of scientific research is again relevant here; increased use of social theory and more integrative approaches in the research that supports policy makers could open options for decision making beyond the positivist perspectives that are increasingly criticized (Cleaver 2012, Meissner 2016a, Cleaver and Whaley 2018.…”

Interest Groups, Scalar Politics and Temporality

“…In my opinion, one of the most important lessons for such practitioners is that cost-benefit analyses, from an economic and social perspective, (Isaacman and Isaacman 2014;Meissner 2015a) are too limited to advance projects like Epupa. When the practitioners behaved unethically towards the OvaHimba they did not act in the interests of the OvaHimba.…”

Friendly environmental policies implementation within the company: an ESG ratings analysis and its applicability to companies´ environmental performance enhancement

“…Therefore, developing diversity policies, such as flexible working hours (FWH) or day-care services (DCS), should increase the environmental awareness of employees. We believe that as basic social needs are covered, they will be more motivated to commit to a more environmental approach, in the line that also indicates Meissner (2015). The role of women, following the feminist theory (Humm, 1995) and its beliefs of women understanding and improving the relationship between places and people (Schneekloth, 1994;Merchant, 1981) is key in linking social and environmental awareness.…”