The relevance of Marx to all students of economics, no matter the level

Abstract

PurposeTo challenge the validity/usefulness of teaching mainstream neo‐classical/new‐classical economics, by contending that Marx provides a superior understanding of the essential nature of the capitalist system.Design/methodology/approachTo explain Marx the hermeneutic issue of which Marx must be addressed. Simultaneous and dualistic interpretations of Marx question Marx's key conclusions, suggesting that Marx's value theory is inconsistent. In contrast the Temporal Single System Interpretation (TSSI) of Marx contends that all of Marx's key conclusions/results hold if one adopts a sequential and non‐dualistic methodological approach, restoring Marx's central message/power.FindingsExplains how Marx endogenously accounts for the inevitable cyclical behaviour of capitalism, its tendency to concentrate and the development of the financial system. In short, Marx can explain the tendencies observed in the globalising world, whereas it is contended that mainstream analysis is hampered by prioritising an ideal simultaneous equilibrium and investigating how it might be exogenously disturbed.Research limitations/implicationsIf, as is contended, Marx's economics provides a superior understanding of the world, then research into Marx and analysis based on Marxian foundations should be prioritised.Practical implicationsMarx should be widely taught to improve students' understanding of the economy.Originality/valueQuite simply challenges orthodoxy by rediscovering value.

Marx and the crisis

“…Economics is an easy game to play if you do not want to look into things too deeply, and are happy to conform to what is expected of you. Economists as the mysterious high priests of capitalism are responsible for the ‘word’ rather than the ‘flesh’ (Potts, 2005). It does not matter that the economics profession failed to predict the crisis: their reconfirmation of the supremacy of the market has fitted politicians’ and businesses’ desire, since the end of the Golden Age in the early 1970s, to spread the market both within developed countries and to ‘developing’ countries.…”

The mythological power of hospitality leaders?

“…Offers a framework for exploring accounting policy from a more holistic perspective Accounting (Chahine, 2006) Uses hermeneutics to explain the differences in earnings announcements, exploring good news announcements and bad news announcements Accounting (Coad & Herbert, 2009) Explores the move away from structuration theory in management accounting towards a more concrete construct Accounting (Ferguson, 2007) Critiques an existing 'textually orientated' approach to accounting through the use of hermeneutics Accounting (Keller, Smith, & Smith, 2007) Uses hermeneutics to study the ethical standards within the accountancy industry Accounting (Oakes & Berry, 2009) How coercive processes among organisations have created a colonising culture within accounting Economics (Drechsler, 2000) Critique the natural sciences in relation to social sciences Economics (Frambach, 2006) Compares the social question and modern market economics through a combination of methodologies including hermeneutics Economics (Hjorth & Johannisson, 2008) An investigation into the central tendencies of Gartner's work using hermeneutics Economics (Johansson, 2001) Uses hermeneutics to analyse the value of consumption Economics (Mathias & Teresa, 2006) Investigates the concept of capability and its apparent foundations in philosophy Economics (Park & Kayatekin, 2000) Explores economic philosophy of standards of conversation through hermeneutics Economics (Peach, 2002) Compares the theories of two prominent economists to illustrate their differences, although it suggests that neither economist has a superior theory Economics (PottsA, 2005) Explores capitalist theories to suggest more useful teaching techniques in economics. Uses hermeneutics to explain why some Marxist views are conflicting.…”