The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relevance of intraventricular chemotherapy for leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer: a randomised study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
178
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
178
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This might explain why in our series as well as in the series of Herrlinger et al [17] the presence of contrast-enhancing lesions is a good prognostic factor in systemically treated patients. To our knowledge there is only one published prospective randomized trial comparing intra-CSF treatment with non-intra-CSF treatment [18]. However, there is increasing evidence that systemic therapy might be efficacious in LM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might explain why in our series as well as in the series of Herrlinger et al [17] the presence of contrast-enhancing lesions is a good prognostic factor in systemically treated patients. To our knowledge there is only one published prospective randomized trial comparing intra-CSF treatment with non-intra-CSF treatment [18]. However, there is increasing evidence that systemic therapy might be efficacious in LM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective comparison of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy and radiation to involved areas, with or without intrathecal chemotherapy, Bokstein et al [74] did not find significant differences in response rates, the median survival time, or the proportion of long-term survivors among the two groups, but of course, the group that did not receive the intrathecal treatment was spared the complications of this modality. Boogerd et al [75], in a small, prospective, randomized phase II study of patients with breast cancer and NM, suggested no benefit to intra-CSF chemotherapy when compared with symptomatic therapy, including involved-field radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy. That study, however, was flawed by poor balancing between known prognostic features affecting survival in patients with NM.…”
Section: Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median survival was 18.3 weeks in the IT arm and 30.3 weeks in the non-IT arm, although no statistical significance was achieved. Neurological complications related to treatment occurred more commonly IT arm (47% vs 6%) 56 . Despite a poor therapeutic index for use in solid tumors, methotrexate and cytarabine in high doses as used occasionally in high grade lymphomas and leukemias, give therapeutic CSF levels.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of concomitant glucocorticoids with the chemotherapy reduces the risk and intensity of the inflammation. There is a report of improving subacute myelopathy caused by intrathecal methotrexate when high doses of S-adenosilmethionine (200 mg, iv three times per day), folinic acid (20 mg, iv four times per day), cyanocobalamin (100 mg, once daily) and methionine (5 g, once daily orally) were supplemented 56 . Acute paraplegia is a rare complication described with use of triple therapy including methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa.…”
Section: Complications Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%