2010
DOI: 10.18352/bmgn-lchr.7114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relevance of Dutch History, or: Much in Little? Reflections on the Practive of History in the Netherlands

Abstract: This essay presents a series of reflections on the relevance of Dutch history.Taking different angles of approach, it examines in particular the historical image and self-image of the Dutch and the nation's cultural identity; the role played by the heritage issue in the rise of the new political nationalism; the fascination of foreign historians for Dutch history and their influence on Dutch historiography itself; the role of language in history-writing and the question of whether 'relevance' is a meaningful c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion in this article is also important to inform future investigations into the relevance of the Dutch context as a mirror for wider European developments (see Frijhoff, 2010;Leeb, 1973, p. 247;Palmer, 1974, p. 323;van Berkel, Frijhoff, & Te Velde, 2010). Until now, the study of public morality and changing political culture in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries has mainly focused on Germany/Prussia (Bernsee, 2013;Engels, 2006;Wagner, 2005), France (Ebhardt, 2013;Engels, 2009;Simon, 2001), and England (see Harling, 2003;Krischer, 2011;Rivers, 1991;Rubinstein, 1983;Wilson, 2007).…”
Section: Early Modern Dutch Authorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The discussion in this article is also important to inform future investigations into the relevance of the Dutch context as a mirror for wider European developments (see Frijhoff, 2010;Leeb, 1973, p. 247;Palmer, 1974, p. 323;van Berkel, Frijhoff, & Te Velde, 2010). Until now, the study of public morality and changing political culture in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries has mainly focused on Germany/Prussia (Bernsee, 2013;Engels, 2006;Wagner, 2005), France (Ebhardt, 2013;Engels, 2009;Simon, 2001), and England (see Harling, 2003;Krischer, 2011;Rivers, 1991;Rubinstein, 1983;Wilson, 2007).…”
Section: Early Modern Dutch Authorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A key element of the Dutch national identity, and featured prominently in history books, is their long-standing tolerance of diverse immigrants (Frijhoff 2010). Liberal multicultural textbooks gloss over cultural differences and histories to depict Dutch people as alike no matter their color or background.…”
Section: Immigrants In the Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European textbooks focus almost exclusively on Europe, discussing Africa only relative to European civilization, dominance, and global power (Frijhoff 2010; Marino 2011; Myers 2001; Sefa Dei 2010). Dutch textbooks project these sentiments to emphasize their unique political, economic, and cultural role in the world, particularly their superior guidance on social issues (Frijhoff 2010). Although the Dutch have long been involved in Africa, scholarship addressing representations of Africa in textbooks is largely limited, in both the Netherlands and Europe at large, to depictions of slavery (which is also underresearched).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%