2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relevance of Dual Tasking for Improving Trunk Muscle Endurance After Back Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, focusing on maximal contraction of a muscle group (e.g., internal focus) during strength exercise has been reported to be superior to increase muscle thickness than external focus (or simply moving the load during strength exercise) 47 . In contrast, external focus or distraction manoeuvres using dual tasks have been reported to improve muscular endurance 48–50 . Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of these cognitive variables on muscle strength and PWH functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, focusing on maximal contraction of a muscle group (e.g., internal focus) during strength exercise has been reported to be superior to increase muscle thickness than external focus (or simply moving the load during strength exercise) 47 . In contrast, external focus or distraction manoeuvres using dual tasks have been reported to improve muscular endurance 48–50 . Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of these cognitive variables on muscle strength and PWH functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 In contrast, external focus or distraction manoeuvres using dual tasks have been reported to improve muscular endurance. [48][49][50] Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of these cognitive variables on muscle strength and PWH functionality.…”
Section: Others Strength Training Prescription Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a reference MCID of 15 for pain and 10 for functional status based on previous findings 30–32. Furthermore, the MCID for the Biering-Sorensen test was 5.3 s as reported by Cruz-Montecinos et al 33. The number needed to treat was also calculated using the Psychometrica online calculator (http://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html) as an estimate of the clinical benefit for the primary outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternations between tasks of a predominantly physical or predominantly cognitive character may occur in other occupations, such as retail and some industrial jobs (Jahncke et al, 2017). Concurrent combinations of physical and cognitive tasks appear to influence motor performance and endurance time compared to only doing the physical task, either in a negative way because the effort increases (Au and Keir, 2007;Mehta andAgnew, 2011, 2012a;Srinivasan et al, 2016;Longo et al, 2018), or positively, by increasing endurance through distraction (Blanchfield et al, 2014;Aleksandrov and Knyazeva, 2017;Grande-Alonso et al, 2020;Cruz-Montezinos et al, 2021). Even the effects on stress and cardiovascular responses appear to be mixed (Finsen et al, 2001a;Alkjaer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%