The relevance of bilateral political relations between countries for the completion stage premium of cross-border mergers and acquisitions

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of bilateral political relations on the completion stage premium of cross-border mergers and acquisitions(CSPCMA) and the moderating roles of cultural distance, trade openness and the nature of firm ownership for this relationship.Design/methodology/approachBased on a sample of 401 cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) conducted by Chinese companies from 1995 to 2019 in the Statistical Data Center (SDC), this article used weighted least squares (WLS) to empirically test the impact of bilateral political relations between countries on the CSPCMA.FindingsThe better the target country of entry’s bilateral political relations with China, the lower the premium of the transaction price paid by Chinese companies at the completion stage of cross-border M&A. Among the moderators, the study found cultural distance positively moderates the relationship between bilateral political relations between countries and CSPCMA. The degree of trade openness of the target country negatively moderates the relationship between bilateral political relations between countries and CSPCMA. The negative relationship between bilateral political relations between countries and CSPCMA is stronger when the acquirer is a state-owned enterprise (SOE).Originality/valueThe findings of this study not only add to the knowledge about the relationship between bilateral political relations and corporate cross-border M&A premiums, but also have managerial implications for Chinese corporate managers to sustainably reduce corporate cross-border M&A premiums.

Unlocking the gender diversity–group performance link: the moderating role of relative cultural distance

“…Third, the mainstream international management research still includes the composite cultural distance index proposed by Kogut and Singh (1988) to synthetically evaluate cultural distance (e.g. Ding et al, 2022;Lee et al, 2021;Li et al, 2021). Indeed, this index is one of the most popular measures based on Hofstede's country-level cultural dimension deviation (which is consistent with our choice of adopting Hofstede's theoretical framework).…”

“…Third, the mainstream international management research still includes the composite cultural distance index proposed by Kogut and Singh (1988) to synthetically evaluate cultural distance (e.g. Ding et al. , 2022; Lee et al.…”

Home country influence in cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging market firms: a systematic review

“…Moreover, by increasing risk, distrust and information asymmetry, poor home-host political relations hinder the completion of Chinese CBMAs (Jiang et al. , 2022) and increase the transaction price paid by Chinese acquirers (Ding et al. , 2022).…”

Toward improved international joint ventures performance in India: the mediating role of ambidexterity and the moderating role of environmental dynamism

“…, 2023; Strange and Humphrey, 2019). The dynamic capability view (DCV) suggests that IJVs must integrate and build the resources to generate significant value through capability mechanisms (Ding et al. , 2022; Sims et al.…”

“…A growing stream of research suggests that cross-cultural joint venture performance can be more fully understood by examining the firm-level factors (Aggarwal and Kapoor, 2021;Chatterjee et al, 2023;Strange and Humphrey, 2019). The dynamic capability view (DCV) suggests that IJVs must integrate and build the resources to generate significant value through capability mechanisms (Ding et al, 2022;Sims et al, 2016;Teece, 2007). Based on this perspective, the present work analyzes firm-level antecedents of IJVs performance.…”