The Release of Pollutants through the Bleeding of Cemented Phosphogypsum Backfill: Link to Protocols for Slurry Preparation

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of protocols for slurry preparation on the release of pollutants into bleeding water from cemented phosphogypsum (PG) backfill. Backfill slurry was prepared using four different protocols in which different parameters varied, including binder/PG ratio, solid concentration, binder type and mixing procedure. The concentrations of phosphate, fluoride and sulfate and the pH values of the obtained bleeding water were measured. The results demonstrated that the slurry preparation protocols affected the quantities of pollutants through the concentrations of pollutants in bleeding water and the bleeding rate. On the one hand, the binder/PG ratio was the key factor influencing the concentrations of all pollutants in bleeding water. Comparatively speaking, the binder type and mixing procedure had an obvious influence on the fluoride concentration but had little influence on the phosphate and sulfate concentrations in the bleeding water. On the other hand, the protocols for slurry preparation affected the bleeding rate by determining the water retention and water content of the backfill slurry. The most effective protocol for slurry preparation for cemented PG backfill could reduce the bleeding rate and enhance the immobilization of pollutants, minimizing the phosphate concentration in bleeding water to below 0.2 mg/L. However, it appeared that the fluoride concentration was still tens of milligrams per liter (over the limit of 10 ten milligrams per liter), to which attention should be paid.

Using Iron Tailings for Phosphate Removal in Cemented Phosphogypsum (PG) Backfill

“…Furthermore, the PG can be a resource to be considered to recover rare earth elements [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Cemented backfill technology with PG as an aggregate can massively recycle PG, solving the problem of PG surface storage; however, the high concentration of phosphate will be released again into the bleeding water of the backfill slurry and the underground leachates, causing secondary pollution and threatening the ecological environment [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Therefore, the efficient removal of phosphate from cemented PG backfill is an issue that cannot be ignored.…”