2020
DOI: 10.1086/701232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Returns to Education, Experience, and Attractiveness for Young Workers

Abstract: Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Founda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our estimates are robust to the inclusion of full controls (column 5); in fact, doing so only increases the magnitude and significance of our estimate (yielding a 21% difference in callbacks). Additional robustness checks include the use of clustered standard errors at the job ad level, as in Lahey and Beasley (2009), Button and Walker (2020) and Beam et al (2020), and applying randomized inference, as in Young ( 2019) and Imbens and Rubin (2015). Our main results are robust to those alternative estimations (see Appendix Table 5 for results with clustering at the job ad level, and row 3 in Table 4 for the randomized inference's p-values).…”
Section: Aggregate Effect Of Beca 18mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, our estimates are robust to the inclusion of full controls (column 5); in fact, doing so only increases the magnitude and significance of our estimate (yielding a 21% difference in callbacks). Additional robustness checks include the use of clustered standard errors at the job ad level, as in Lahey and Beasley (2009), Button and Walker (2020) and Beam et al (2020), and applying randomized inference, as in Young ( 2019) and Imbens and Rubin (2015). Our main results are robust to those alternative estimations (see Appendix Table 5 for results with clustering at the job ad level, and row 3 in Table 4 for the randomized inference's p-values).…”
Section: Aggregate Effect Of Beca 18mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…12 These missing data were linked to ten studies: Beam et al (2020), Carlsson and Eriksson (2019), Darolia et al (2016), Drydakis (2017), Guul et al (2019, Patacchini et al (2015), Stone and Wright (2013), Thijssen, Coenders, & Lancee (2021), Thomas (2018), and Yemane and Fernández-Reino (2021).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Like the domestic Philippine labor market (Beam et al 2020), overseas positions are highly sex segregated.…”
Section: Online Job-posting Datamentioning
confidence: 99%