2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative invasive disease potential of Streptococcus pneumoniae among children after PCV introduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: There is substantial variation among pneumococcal serotypes in their potential to cause IPD and disease presentation, which is influenced by age and time after PCV introduction. Surveillance of IPD and carriage is critical to understand the expected effectiveness of current PCVs (in the longer term) and guide the development of future vaccines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for serotypes 11A and 24F, cells expressing PSGL-1 did not kill efficiently these particular serotypes suggesting that strains expressing these two CPS, may have an increased ability to produce IPD. This is consistent with the emergence of amoxicillin-resistant variants of serotype 11A with genotype ST6521 that avoid efficiently the phagocytosis process and are good biofilm formers (Aguinagalde et al, 2015) and with the increased severity of infection by isolates of serotype 24F (Balsells et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for serotypes 11A and 24F, cells expressing PSGL-1 did not kill efficiently these particular serotypes suggesting that strains expressing these two CPS, may have an increased ability to produce IPD. This is consistent with the emergence of amoxicillin-resistant variants of serotype 11A with genotype ST6521 that avoid efficiently the phagocytosis process and are good biofilm formers (Aguinagalde et al, 2015) and with the increased severity of infection by isolates of serotype 24F (Balsells et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…in patients with COPD, serotypes 3 and 11A are among the most prevalent (Shoji et al, 2018). In addition, serotype 24F is more prone to cause meningitis, showing an increase in clinical severity (Balsells et al, 2018) which could be associated to the increase resistant pattern to phagocytosis when replicating as a biofilm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high proportion of both penicillin and macrolide non-susceptible isolates in our study was found to be related to NT isolates. The recently published meta-analysis of estimated invasive disease potential for individual pneumococcal serotypes showed a low disease potential for non-serotypeable pneumococci [44]. However, all non-serotypeable isolates in our study were closely related and belonged to the ST344-cluster, the globally disseminated PMEN clone Norway NT -42, vaccination against which is so far unavailable.…”
Section: Effects Of Pcv-13 Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The seven most common serotypes (14, 6B, 23F, 19F, 6A, 9 V, 18C) from our study were previously described in the group of the ten most common serotypes of IPD cases globally [43], and they are a part of PCV-13. Three other PCV-13associated serotypes 1, 5 and 7F are not frequently detected among pneumococcal carriage isolates in Russia [30][31][32] nor in other geographical areas [40,41] but were generally related to cases of IPD in infants and young children [44][45][46].…”
Section: Distribution Of Serotypesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The rare occurrence of certain GBS serotypes in maternal carriage and neonatal disease, however, makes it difficult to estimate these quantities with certainty, even in large samples. 20,21 While randomeffects meta-analysis of data from multiple epidemiologic studies may thus present an attractive analysis strategy, 22 investigators remain likely to encounter challenges when generating pooled risk ratios or odds ratios in the presence of zero-valued counts within studies. Common ad-hoc workarounds, such as "continuity corrections" adding a fixed value to cells [23][24][25] and simple summing or averaging of values across studies, 13 risk introducing bias in both point estimates and measures of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%