2021
DOI: 10.1002/mcf2.10176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Influence of Age Structure, Predation, and Temperature on Stock–Recruitment Dynamics: A Case Study of Southern New England/Mid‐Atlantic Winter Flounder

Abstract: Stock size estimates used in stock-recruitment models often assume that reproductive output per individual is equal despite evidence that larger, older spawners contribute diverse spawning behaviors and disproportionately more to reproductive output. This is concerning since depleted population states often coincide with a compromised age structure and increased control of extrinsic forces (environmental conditions or predator-prey dynamics) on stock productivity. In this study, parameterizations of the stock-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that a high relative abundance of Cisco is associated with a higher probability of stable annual recruitment (i.e., more year‐classes present) and higher survival (i.e., higher maximum ages). The presence of more and diverse age‐classes within a population may confer some level of resilience to environmental stressors or other factors that may serve to decrease population productivity (e.g., Secor 2007; Siskey and Frisk 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest that a high relative abundance of Cisco is associated with a higher probability of stable annual recruitment (i.e., more year‐classes present) and higher survival (i.e., higher maximum ages). The presence of more and diverse age‐classes within a population may confer some level of resilience to environmental stressors or other factors that may serve to decrease population productivity (e.g., Secor 2007; Siskey and Frisk 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%