1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf00992975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative importance of autotrophic and heterotrophic nitrification in a conifer forest soil as measured by15N tracer and pool dilution techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
4
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
58
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data indicate that the nitrifying community produced nitrate at the expense of organic rather than inorganic sources of ammonia. We are confident that we accurately determined PNA rates in the present study because of the following: (i) the average rates of PNA were similar to those observed by Fenn and colleagues for the same soils sampled in 1994 (17), (ii) the rates of PNA were mostly higher than those measured in other acidic forest soils (33,37,40), and (iii) acetylene completely inhibited a very high rate of PNA in a fertilized sandy soil control (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data indicate that the nitrifying community produced nitrate at the expense of organic rather than inorganic sources of ammonia. We are confident that we accurately determined PNA rates in the present study because of the following: (i) the average rates of PNA were similar to those observed by Fenn and colleagues for the same soils sampled in 1994 (17), (ii) the rates of PNA were mostly higher than those measured in other acidic forest soils (33,37,40), and (iii) acetylene completely inhibited a very high rate of PNA in a fertilized sandy soil control (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Together, our observations indicate that other microbial populations or other processes besides those involving autotrophic AOB were likely responsible for relatively high PNA rates in CP and SP soils, whereas low PNA rates in the less N-impacted DW soil were predominantly catalyzed by autotrophic AOB. Low autotrophic AOB activities were also observed in mixed-conifer forest soils in the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California, where nitrification activity was only partially inhibited by acetylene (40). This study used 15 N pool dilution techniques to demonstrate that inorganic ammonia was not the substrate for nitrate accumulation in mature forest soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterotrophic nitrification is likely to be performed by fungi characterized by higher microbial C:N ratios than bacteria (Landi et al 1993, Paul andClark 1996), which coincides with our finding of high microbial C:N ratios during key periods of gross nitrification (Table 2). Heterotrophic nitrification has been reported to dominate over autotrophic nitrification in several soils ranging from various forest ecosystems (Burton et al 2007, Grenon et al 2004, Pedersen et al 1999, Koyama et al 2010) to grassland (Cookson et al 2006, Mü ller et al 2002, 2009, Rü tting et al 2008. Nonetheless, the actual contribution of heterotrophic nitrification to total gross nitrification remains unclear in our as well as in most other studies, unless 15 NO 3 À pool dilution studies combined with selective inhibitors of autotrophic or heterotrophic nitrification (Barraclough and Puri 1995) are performed.…”
Section: Environmental Controls Of Gross N Turnovercontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…This population density is 40-to 150-fold greater than the average MPN values obtained from the forest soil samples at Carpenter (ϳ1,000 g of soil Ϫ1 ) and far greater than the estimates made at Lookout. Although such discrepancies indicate that heterotrophic nitrification might be a source of oxidized nitrogen in these coniferous forest soil environments (35), our finding that acetylene completely inhibited NPRs across all transect positions suggests this was likely to be autotrophic nitrification. In this context, others have shown that the size of populations of AOB determined by quantitative PCR can be 10 to 500 times greater than values determined by traditional MPN methods (28,36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%