1956
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(56)94830-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Feeding Value of Alfalfa Hay and Alfalfa Light Timothy Mixed Hay at Approximately The U. S. No. 1 Grade Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feedstuff digestibility for Holstein heifers fed diets that contained no roughage (Mead and Goss, 1935) was shown to be consistent with what would be calculated from ingredient digestibility coefficients determined from the book values of Henry and Morrison (1923), which had been determined when forage was fed. Differing hay quality grades affected gains and feed efficiency (Kelkar and Gullickson, 1950;Gordon et al, 1954Gordon et al, , 1956; however, it was noted that the current chemical and physical analyses were insufficient to completely characterize the value of hays for heifer growth (Gordon et al, 1952). Donker et al (1968) published a method for evaluating forage energy production formulas by comparing various published energy intake estimates with heifer requirements.…”
Section: Nutrient Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedstuff digestibility for Holstein heifers fed diets that contained no roughage (Mead and Goss, 1935) was shown to be consistent with what would be calculated from ingredient digestibility coefficients determined from the book values of Henry and Morrison (1923), which had been determined when forage was fed. Differing hay quality grades affected gains and feed efficiency (Kelkar and Gullickson, 1950;Gordon et al, 1954Gordon et al, , 1956; however, it was noted that the current chemical and physical analyses were insufficient to completely characterize the value of hays for heifer growth (Gordon et al, 1952). Donker et al (1968) published a method for evaluating forage energy production formulas by comparing various published energy intake estimates with heifer requirements.…”
Section: Nutrient Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%