2012
DOI: 10.1258/acb.2012.011241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative effects of fat versus muscle mass on cystatin C and estimates of renal function in healthy young men

Abstract: Background: It is well known that plasma creatinine concentration is affected by muscle mass, while some studies have suggested cystatin C is affected by body mass index (BMI). Our aim was to assess the effects of lean versus fat mass on cystatin C and creatinine derivative equations in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in healthy young men. Methods: Three groups of participants were studied: those classified as normal (BMI 18-25 kg/m 2 with body fat ,30%); mus-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
49
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings of cystatin C based equations being influenced by obesity are supported by other studies [28] including Asian and Indigenous populations [29][30][31]. One observational study of immigrant South Asians was also able to demonstrate that the relationship between increasing adiposity and eGFRcysC was largely explained by factors related with chronic inflammation, including c-reactive protein [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our findings of cystatin C based equations being influenced by obesity are supported by other studies [28] including Asian and Indigenous populations [29][30][31]. One observational study of immigrant South Asians was also able to demonstrate that the relationship between increasing adiposity and eGFRcysC was largely explained by factors related with chronic inflammation, including c-reactive protein [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The known effects of muscle mass/creatinine generation on the serum creatinine concentration and the known effects of fat mass on the serum cystatin C concentration (more fat mass is associated with higher cystatin C concentrations) likely results in an underestimation of the prevalence of sarcopenia when eGFR Cr is used and an overestimation of the prevalence of obesity when eGFR Cys is used. [34] This finding highlights the complexity of studying sarcopenia and obesity in the CKD population and either the application of other marker solutes (e.g., beta trace protein) when studying the association between CKD and body composition, or at a minimum, the recognition that conventional GFR-estimating equations can be biased by alterations from the typical muscle or fat mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Plasma cystatin C was measured using a particleenhanced nephelometric immunoassay on a Behring Nephelometer II analyzer (Siemens Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany), with a CV <4.5% [27]. The use of this assay for cystatin C is consistent with the recommendations by Shlipak et al [28].…”
Section: Gentamicin Creatinine and Cystatin C Assaysmentioning
confidence: 68%