2012
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative contributions of insect and bird pollinators to outcrossing in an African Protea (Proteaceae)

Abstract: Since outcrossing rates were not reduced when birds were excluded, we infer that insects are effective agents of cross pollination in P. caffra. This helps to explain the evolution of traits associated with insect pollination, such as fruity floral scent, in this species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We considered differences between treatment groups significant if 97.5% of the differences between randomly paired bootstrap estimates were greater or less than zero, following Steenhuisen et al . (). We used the same approach to determine whether estimates of biparental inbreeding differed significantly from zero.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We considered differences between treatment groups significant if 97.5% of the differences between randomly paired bootstrap estimates were greater or less than zero, following Steenhuisen et al . (). We used the same approach to determine whether estimates of biparental inbreeding differed significantly from zero.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Differences in mating system parameters between exclusion treatments were assessed through pairwise comparisons of bootstrap estimates, following Eckert & Barrett (1994). We considered differences between treatment groups significant if 97.5% of the differences between randomly paired bootstrap estimates were greater or less than zero, following Steenhuisen et al (2012). We used the same approach to determine whether estimates of biparental inbreeding differed significantly from zero.…”
Section: Estimation Of Mating Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, birds were more effective in their quality effectiveness (e.g., Robertson et al 2005;Fumero-Cabán and Meléndez-Ackerman 2007), while in others in their quantity (Waser and Price 1990;Vaughton 1992;Mayfield et al 2001). Birds appear to be more effective than ectothermic pollinators (e.g., insects, lizards) when these are scarce (Steenhuisen et al 2012), in high-elevation habitats (Cruden 1972) or in early flowering periods, when temperatures are usually low and limit the activity of ectotherms (Waser and Price 1990;Vaughton 1992;Valido et al 2002). Thus, this pattern of greater variation in QNC than in QLC is expected for those pollinator assemblages, such as our study system, with marked inter-specific differences in life modes.…”
Section: The Pe Landscapementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Apparently, the genotypic diversity was high enough to prevent broad scale intra‐clonal pollination. Alternatively, when the homozygotes are viable but exhibit reduced fitness due to inbreeding depression, their contribution at the population level may be minimal (Hämmerli and Reusch , Steenhuisen et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%