2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2008.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative biological effectiveness of proton and ion beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a generic RBE of 1.1 is generally applied to clinical use (Wambersie 1999, there are many uncertainties regarding proton RBE (Wambersie 2004, Jäkel 2008. For the evaluation of RBE value, the endpoints that have been applied include loss of clonogenicity, apoptosis induction in in vitro studies (Matsumura et al 1999, Kagawa et al 2002, Moertel et al 2004, Oya et al 2008, and crypt disappearance in in vivo studies (Uzawa et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a generic RBE of 1.1 is generally applied to clinical use (Wambersie 1999, there are many uncertainties regarding proton RBE (Wambersie 2004, Jäkel 2008. For the evaluation of RBE value, the endpoints that have been applied include loss of clonogenicity, apoptosis induction in in vitro studies (Matsumura et al 1999, Kagawa et al 2002, Moertel et al 2004, Oya et al 2008, and crypt disappearance in in vivo studies (Uzawa et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, their biological characteristics have been analysed primarily in comparison to photons (Belli et al 1993, Ando et al 2001, Belli et al 2001, Kagawa et al 2002, Moertel et al 2004, Baek et al 2008. Although the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values of protons range between small limits, proton RBE can differ according to energy and depth (Gerweck and Kozin 1999, Paganetti 2005, Jäkel 2008. RBE values can also differ according to the endpoints or tissues in terms of alpha/beta (a/b) values (Paganetti et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both primary and secondary delta ray tracks from heavy ion radiation is highly ionizing and will cause significant damage to the cells they traverse (Curtis et al 1992, Brooks et al 2001a) with short term as well as long term consequences. Of major short term concern are injury to rapidly proliferating cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and bone marrow (BM), because of the prediction that astronauts could receive enough HZE dose from GCR and solar particle events (SPE) to perturb these tissues in long-term missions (Jakel 2008). Also, in the short term, exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) decreases host immune defense via its effects on the GI tract and BM, thus enhancing the risk of developing local and systemic infection due to endogenous as well as exogenous microorganisms (Brook et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the biological effects of different radiation qualities is usually being performed in terms of relative biological effectiveness (RBE). 6 In radiotherapy, the RBE is not only of highest interest for cell killing but also for late effects such as cancerogenesis ( 149 ). For the various biological endpoints, the RBE can depend on many factors, such as LET, dose rate, dose fractionation, radiation dose, and type of the irradiated cells or tissues.…”
Section: Influence Of Linear Energy Transfer On Transcription Factor mentioning
confidence: 99%