2000
DOI: 10.1086/317231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Age of the Thin and Thick Galactic Disks

Abstract: We determine the relative ages of the open cluster NGC 188 and selected Hipparcos Ðeld stars by isochrone Ðtting and compare them to the age of the thick-disk globular cluster 47 Tuc. The best-Ðt age for NGC 188 was determined to be 6.5^1.0 Gyr. The solar-metallicity Hipparcos Ðeld stars yielded a slightly older thin-disk age, 7.5^0.7 Gyr. Two slightly metal-poor ([Fe/H] \ [0.22) Ðeld stars whose kinematic and orbital parameters indicate that they are members of the thin disk were found to have an age of 9

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
50
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
9
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age of 7.9 Gyr for the local disk Hipparcos subgiants agrees very well with the age of the local disk white dwarfs based on the white dwarf luminosity function and modern cooling theory. The age of 13.5 Gyr for the halo globular cluster M92 and the field subdwarfs of the halo population suggests an appreciable age difference between the local disk subgiants of up to 5 Gyr or more, a conclustion reached earlier by Liu & Chaboyer (2000). This is supported by the discovery (Hansen et al 2002) that the faintest white dwarfs in the globular cluster M4 are 2.5 mag fainter than the faintest white dwarfs that define the local WD luminosity function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The age of 7.9 Gyr for the local disk Hipparcos subgiants agrees very well with the age of the local disk white dwarfs based on the white dwarf luminosity function and modern cooling theory. The age of 13.5 Gyr for the halo globular cluster M92 and the field subdwarfs of the halo population suggests an appreciable age difference between the local disk subgiants of up to 5 Gyr or more, a conclustion reached earlier by Liu & Chaboyer (2000). This is supported by the discovery (Hansen et al 2002) that the faintest white dwarfs in the globular cluster M4 are 2.5 mag fainter than the faintest white dwarfs that define the local WD luminosity function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In fact, several authors since Peebles & Dicke (1968) related the large overdensities required to the formation of globular clusters to violent phases connected to accretion episodes, that would have disrupted or at least considerably heated the thin disk. It is then interesting that a phase of low star formation followed the formation of the thick disk (see Gratton et al 1996Gratton et al , 2000Fuhrmann 1998;Liu & Chaboyer 2000), and of its population of globular clusters, like 47 Tuc (Zinn 1985), before the formation of the thin disk started. After this phase, only a few globular clusters actually formed; most of these objects (like e.g.…”
Section: The Epoch Of Galaxy Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on 47 Tuc that employed various stellar tracers, such as red giants (AlvesBrito et al 2005), subgiants and dwarfs (Carretta et al 2004) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars (Wylie et al 2006), all agree on a mean metallicity near −0.7 dex; however, no consensus about an accurate absolute [Fe/H] has been reached, yet. In particular the age of 47 Tuc has been the subject of debate: while Gratton et al (2003) estimate an age of ∼11 Gyr, thus 2.6 Gyr younger than the old Galactic halo, McNamara (2001) and Liu & Chaboyer (2000) suggest an age in excess of 12.5 Gyr and thus comparable to the halo component. Several studies argue that 47 Tuc's color-magnitude diagram (CMD) bears a striking resemblance with the solar metallicity bulge clusters NGC 6553 and NGC 6528 (Ortolani et al 1995;Zoccali et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%