1952
DOI: 10.1037/h0056411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative abilities of leaders and non-leaders to estimate opinions of their own groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first mechanism concerns accurate social perception (Chowdry & Newcomb, 1952). Displays of emotions communicate important information to others (Frijda & Mesquita, 1994).…”
Section: Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Emergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first mechanism concerns accurate social perception (Chowdry & Newcomb, 1952). Displays of emotions communicate important information to others (Frijda & Mesquita, 1994).…”
Section: Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Emergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past investigations on emerging leaders proposed that they are competent and experienced in taking in and understanding emotional information. This study demonstrated that emergent group leaders were socially perceptive and uniquely able to identify and understand unstated team needs (Chowdhry & Newcomb, 1952).…”
Section: Findings Inmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Since the time of Cdoley (7)> small group analysts have tested how the empathic ability of members related to group effectiven^s and member status within die group. Chowdry and Newcomb found leaders ia a religious group, a political group, and a medical fraternity to be significandy b^ter perceivers of group opinion than non-leaders (6). Empathic ability may be an important characteristic of individuals ia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%