2008
DOI: 10.1291/hypres.31.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationships of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors to Flow-Mediated Dilatation in Japanese Subjects Free of Cardiovascular Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17) However, A-mode imaging by current ultrasonography devices (which also allow simultaneous monitoring of the appropriate transducer position by B-mode imaging) allows the aforementioned lower reproducibility to be overcome: the variation coefficient of the results of B-mode imaging reported by Donald, et al was 8.6%, 17) whereas that of A-mode imaging in our previous study was 11.2%. 18) The usefulness of the multimarker approach to assess the risk for cardiovascular disease, including the measurement of not only the biochemical markers, but also of the physiological and proteomic biomarkers, has not yet been clarified. FMD is a marker of endothelial function, an early-stage abnormality in atherosclerosis, and is especially related to endothelial NO bioavailability, which in turn has pivotal roles in vascular and organ protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17) However, A-mode imaging by current ultrasonography devices (which also allow simultaneous monitoring of the appropriate transducer position by B-mode imaging) allows the aforementioned lower reproducibility to be overcome: the variation coefficient of the results of B-mode imaging reported by Donald, et al was 8.6%, 17) whereas that of A-mode imaging in our previous study was 11.2%. 18) The usefulness of the multimarker approach to assess the risk for cardiovascular disease, including the measurement of not only the biochemical markers, but also of the physiological and proteomic biomarkers, has not yet been clarified. FMD is a marker of endothelial function, an early-stage abnormality in atherosclerosis, and is especially related to endothelial NO bioavailability, which in turn has pivotal roles in vascular and organ protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the reproducibility of the measurement of FMD using this system, its correlation coefficient between two examinations was reported to be 0.86 with a coefficient of variance (CV) of 11.2% 18) . In brief, the diameter of the brachial artery at rest was measured in the assessment of these markers using ultrasonography is non-invasive and cost-effective, the precision and reliability of the method are questionable, and the method is technically complex 5) .…”
Section: Measurement Of Fmd and Nmd Using A Novel Ultrasound Systemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies using edge detection software to estimate FMD have reported intersession coefficients of variation of approximately 11-18% 101,106,107) . Traditionally, end-diastolic diameters were used to calculate FMD because: 1) FMD measurements that incorporate nonend-diastolic diameters may introduce measurement errors due to fixed vessel structural issues, and 2) prior to the advent of automated image analysis software, mean diameter measurements were beyond the technical capabilities of most research units.…”
Section: Automated Diameter Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%