2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationships between firm size, prospector strategy, architecture of information technology and firm performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three main dimensions measuring strategy were customer perspective (Wu & Olk, 2014), internal processes (Kalkan, Erdlib & Cetinkayac, 2011;Lim, Stratopoulos, & Wirjanto, 2012), and competitive strategy (Kalkan et., 2011;Venkatraman, Henderson & Oldach, 1993). These dimensions were initially used to measure strategy, however for the purpose of this study they were measured as a single construct of e-strategy by including the online delivery component into the items in the questionnaire.…”
Section: E-strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three main dimensions measuring strategy were customer perspective (Wu & Olk, 2014), internal processes (Kalkan, Erdlib & Cetinkayac, 2011;Lim, Stratopoulos, & Wirjanto, 2012), and competitive strategy (Kalkan et., 2011;Venkatraman, Henderson & Oldach, 1993). These dimensions were initially used to measure strategy, however for the purpose of this study they were measured as a single construct of e-strategy by including the online delivery component into the items in the questionnaire.…”
Section: E-strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ordanini and Rubera (2010) and Kalkan, Erdil and Çetinkaya (2011), IT competency impacts performance after it satisfies the RBV's proposed conditions in terms of value, rareness, and inimitability. Hence, this study proposed that RBV supports the direct relationship between IT integration and a firm's market performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly important considering that ICT projects are used to realise organisational strategies (Chari, Devaraj & David 2007;Hu & Quan 2005;Kim & Sanders 2002). Organisations invest significant capital into ICT projects with the intention of catalysing improved organisation performance (Kalkan, Erdil & Çetinkaya 2011;Kossaï & Piget 2014). Literature asserts that there is a positive relationship between ICT investment and organisational performance (Farhanghi, Abbaspour & Ghassemi 2013;Hu & Quan 2005;Kalkan et al 2011;Osei-Bryson & Ko 2004;).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisations invest significant capital into ICT projects with the intention of catalysing improved organisation performance (Kalkan, Erdil & Çetinkaya 2011;Kossaï & Piget 2014). Literature asserts that there is a positive relationship between ICT investment and organisational performance (Farhanghi, Abbaspour & Ghassemi 2013;Hu & Quan 2005;Kalkan et al 2011;Osei-Bryson & Ko 2004;). ICT projects do, however, have a bad reputation of lacklustre performance rates both internationally and within South Africa (Curtis 2012;Joseph, Erasmus & Marnewick 2014;Hastie & Wojewoda 2015;Marnewick 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%