1988
DOI: 10.1016/0361-476x(88)90002-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of student interest and advance organizer effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the Advance Organizers learning strategy group recorded better performance than the two other groups. This result negates Lane (1988) and Olaosun (1996)`s findings that there was no significant difference between advance organizers groups and partial trestment groups. This same findings also do not corroborate the earlier findings of Barnes and Clawson (1975), Bricker (1987) were all of the opinion that advance organizers learning strategy does not significant difference on the students` performance over the control group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The results showed that the Advance Organizers learning strategy group recorded better performance than the two other groups. This result negates Lane (1988) and Olaosun (1996)`s findings that there was no significant difference between advance organizers groups and partial trestment groups. This same findings also do not corroborate the earlier findings of Barnes and Clawson (1975), Bricker (1987) were all of the opinion that advance organizers learning strategy does not significant difference on the students` performance over the control group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Situational interest can be partially controlled through facilitation and task design, but in the absence of the learner’s ability to perceive and attend to the stimulus, and without some degree of internalization and reflection, the information presented is unlikely to result in any real learning (Ahissar & Hochstein, 1993; Clapper, 2010a; Kang et al, 2010; Phelps, 2004). Advance organizers, including the KWL chart (what do you know, want to know, and what have you learned ; Table 1) and the Think-Write-Pair-Share cooperative learning strategy, encourage reflective, active learning and have been shown to be effective for maintaining interest in adult learners (Lane, Newman, & Bull, 1988). Advance organizers proved effective for clinical simulation pioneers, including M. C. Blanchaer (1984), who used them to improve the quality of computer-based simulation for undergraduate health science professionals.…”
Section: Creating and Maintaining Situational Interest Through Instrumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had hoped that subjects would rate the texts a bit higher on interestingness and were surprised that they did not in that other subjects in a pretest of five topics had rated the Kuiper and Sensors topics as quite interesting. Existing research would suggest that if subjects had considered the texts somewhat interesting, overall recall might have been higher (Scott and McClintock, 1985;Lane, Newman, and Bull, 1988).…”
Section: Readers' Perceptions Of Text Contentmentioning
confidence: 97%