“…As Table 2 shows, there has been a large amount of variability in the measurement of metallicity which is difficult to critique without detailed analysis of the various methods used. In the absence of this information the calculations used for this paper, the value determined by (Neeley et al, 2017) was selected as (Gaia et al, 2018) Coordinates Dec -15 44 31.8 Period 0.587246d (Carrillo et al, 1995) 0.587247d (Kovacs, 2005) 0.587242d (Neeley et al, 2017) Teff 6178K (Andrievsky et al, 2017) 6300K (Siegel, 1982) Radial 80Km/s-1 (Andrievsky et al, 2017) Velocity Spectral Type F2D (Gaia et al, 2018) Mv 0.41 (Siegel, 1982) 0.66 (Fernley, Carney, Skillen, Cacciari, & Janes, 1998) 0.54 (Woolley & Dean, 1976) Vmag 9.72 (Kovacs, 2005) 9.70 (Carrillo et al, 1995) 9.69 (Muraveva et al, 2015) O/Fe 0.52 (Andrievsky et al, 2017) Na/Fe -0.37 (Andrievsky et al, 2017) it represented the measurement most related to the time the photometric measurements were made and is also a mode value of the data presented.…”