Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Conference on Computers and People Research 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2599990.2600012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of personality models and development tasks in software engineering

Abstract: Understanding the personality of software developers has been an ongoing topic in software engineering research. Software engineering researchers applied different theoretical models to understand software developers' personalities to better predict software developers' performance, orchestrate more effective and motivated teams, and identify the person that fits a certain job best. However, empirical results were found as contradicting, challenging validity, and missing guidance for IT personnel selection. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible direction for future research could be to analyze whether different types of personalities cope differently with the failure and therefore differ regarding learning from failure [58].…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible direction for future research could be to analyze whether different types of personalities cope differently with the failure and therefore differ regarding learning from failure [58].…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of subgroups could also be different in larger teams. Subgroups, based on special competencies of certain team members [58], could form in large teams.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further related research studies on the mindset and motivation of software engineers and their psychological personal types can be found in [1,6,16,19,21,24,25].…”
Section: Research Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%