2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2014.2382071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of Permeability and Permittivity at the Perfect Matching Point of Electromagnetic Wave Absorption for the Absorber Filled by Metallic Magnetic Particles

Abstract: The electromagnetic wave absorption properties of flake-shaped carbonyl-iron/paraffin composites with various volume concentrations were calculated by the measured complex permeability and permittivity. The complete electromagnetic wave absorption was searched for the volume concentration of 0.125, 0.15 and 0.20 at 5.8, 4, and 3.6 GHz, respectively. The permittivity is much larger than the permeability at the complete absorption frequency points. Based on the origin of the absorbing peaks, the contour map disp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In QWM, it has been wrongly claimed [26,30] that the minima of RL(dB) occur at the energy difference of beams r and t. But it is clearly shown here that RL(dB) is related to phase difference and not to energy difference. The amplitude of beam b can be enhanced or reduced from the superposition of beams r and t. Indeed, the amplitude of beam b is related to that part of the incident microwave energy returned to the open space, but the energy of beam b is not equal to the sum of energy of beams r and t. All the other parts of the incident microwaves not reflected have been absorbed by the film.…”
Section: The Positions Of Minimum Reflection Loss and Phase Effectmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In QWM, it has been wrongly claimed [26,30] that the minima of RL(dB) occur at the energy difference of beams r and t. But it is clearly shown here that RL(dB) is related to phase difference and not to energy difference. The amplitude of beam b can be enhanced or reduced from the superposition of beams r and t. Indeed, the amplitude of beam b is related to that part of the incident microwave energy returned to the open space, but the energy of beam b is not equal to the sum of energy of beams r and t. All the other parts of the incident microwaves not reflected have been absorbed by the film.…”
Section: The Positions Of Minimum Reflection Loss and Phase Effectmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…At this time, the two kinds of electromagnetic waves will produce destructive interference at the front interface, and the RL will have a minimum value, forming a strong absorption peak. The condition that the thickness of the absorber is equal to an odd multiple of λ /4 is [32] t m = nc The smaller the sum of the electromagnetic wave amplitudes at the front interface is, the more energy the absorber absorbs, and the smaller the RL (the larger the absolute value). It can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Parameters Of Y 2 Co 17 /Pu Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon can be attributed to the decrease of the complex permeability and the increase of the complex permittivity with the increase of temperature, and thus resulting in an undesirable impedance matching performance and a deteriorated microwave absorption performance. Additionally, according to the interface reflection model, when a strong absorption peak appears, the relationship between the thickness of the absorber and the peak frequency can be expressed as: t m = nc 4fm √ |µrεr| [30]. We know that the thickness of the absorber is inversely proportional to the |µ r ε r | value.…”
Section: Microwave Absorption Performancementioning
confidence: 99%