2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0234-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of in vivo central CB1 receptor occupancy to changes in cortical monoamine release and feeding elicited by CB1 receptor antagonists in rats

Abstract: The occupancy method described here is an effective tool for interrelating central CB(1) receptor occupancy with neurobiological actions of CB(1) receptor antagonists and for furthering our understanding of the role of CB(1) receptors in central nervous system physiology and pathology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, body weight phenotype of the heterozygous mice has not been reported. In addition, it has not been reported whether complete blockade or partial inhibition of CB1R is required for chronic weight loss efficacy, whereas variable occupancy has been reported for different compounds to achieve acute food intake inhibition (Need et al, 2006). In the present study, we evaluated the in vitro and in vivo pharmacological properties of a novel compound MK-0364 (Lin et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, body weight phenotype of the heterozygous mice has not been reported. In addition, it has not been reported whether complete blockade or partial inhibition of CB1R is required for chronic weight loss efficacy, whereas variable occupancy has been reported for different compounds to achieve acute food intake inhibition (Need et al, 2006). In the present study, we evaluated the in vitro and in vivo pharmacological properties of a novel compound MK-0364 (Lin et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The 1-hour time point was chosen to be at the upper end of the post-tracer survival interval we routinely use in our RO experiments (Chernet et al, 2005;Need et al, 2006). The lowest dose we could measure at this time point is a function of the LC/MS/MS equipment available to us and the ionizability of the tracer molecule in the mass spectrometer source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the lower tissue concentration of tracer measured in these animals is only reflective of C nonspec and is assigned to a value of 100% occupancy. An appropriate time period, a so-called post-tracer survival interval, is needed after tracer administration for the tracer to bind the receptor and for the nonspecific binding to decrease such that a high ratio of total to nonspecific binding is achieved (Need et al, 2006). Consequently, once a promising tracer candidate has been identified, several tracer doses-and sometimes also post-tracer survival intervals-are tested to develop experimental procedures that yield a high ratio of total to nonspecific binding.…”
Section: Development Of a Pulmonary In Vivo Receptor Occupancy Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%