1988
DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1988.16.2.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of hypoxia to hypoxanthine concentration during pregnancy and delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In experiments with rats, severe hypoxia led to increased hypoxanthine levels and decreased ATP levels in both CSF and brain tissues [112]. The first studies of plasma concentrations of hypoxanthine in humans were performed with cord blood, with increased levels being detected in children with hypoxia [113]; these results have been confirmed by other authors [113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122], (Table 8), who have reported that hypoxanthine level in cord blood is negatively correlated with Apgar score, and positively correlated with lactate level [96]. It has been suggested that hypoxanthine level is a better predictor of hypoxia-related sequelae than Apgar score or lactate level [96,117,123].…”
Section: Hypoxanthine and Xanthinementioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In experiments with rats, severe hypoxia led to increased hypoxanthine levels and decreased ATP levels in both CSF and brain tissues [112]. The first studies of plasma concentrations of hypoxanthine in humans were performed with cord blood, with increased levels being detected in children with hypoxia [113]; these results have been confirmed by other authors [113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122], (Table 8), who have reported that hypoxanthine level in cord blood is negatively correlated with Apgar score, and positively correlated with lactate level [96]. It has been suggested that hypoxanthine level is a better predictor of hypoxia-related sequelae than Apgar score or lactate level [96,117,123].…”
Section: Hypoxanthine and Xanthinementioning
confidence: 74%
“…19.2 ± 5.8 (n = 4) < 0.005 Issel et al [121] 5.1 ± 1.8 (n = 28) 10.0 ± 3.4 (n = 3) < 0.01 Russell et al [122] 7.8 (2.4-48.9) (n = 8) * 31.9 (7.1-142.9) (n = 7) * < 0.005 NS = Not significant. * = Data are expressed as median (range).…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 92%