2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7894(01)80029-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of child worry to cognitive biases: Threat interpretation and likelihood of event occurrence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
41
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[120] Finally, individuals with high trait anxiety or GAD tend to interpret ambiguous events as threatening (e.g., [121] ). These findings also are true for anxious children; compared to controls, anxious children expect a larger number of negative outcomes and more negative events to happen to them (e.g., [122] ). Studies of lexical decisions that assess ''on-line'' interpretations at the time participants are exposed to ambiguous stimuli have similarly shown a negative bias in relation to trait anxiety and social anxiety (e.g., [123] ), albeit not always (e.g., [124] ).…”
Section: Information Processing Biasmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[120] Finally, individuals with high trait anxiety or GAD tend to interpret ambiguous events as threatening (e.g., [121] ). These findings also are true for anxious children; compared to controls, anxious children expect a larger number of negative outcomes and more negative events to happen to them (e.g., [122] ). Studies of lexical decisions that assess ''on-line'' interpretations at the time participants are exposed to ambiguous stimuli have similarly shown a negative bias in relation to trait anxiety and social anxiety (e.g., [123] ), albeit not always (e.g., [124] ).…”
Section: Information Processing Biasmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Non-aggressive children, particularly those who may be described as socially wary and withdrawn, may view interpersonal situations such as peer group entry as stressful and anxiety-producing; in their case, avoidance evoked by fear or wariness may be the social consequence. Thus, an inability to regulate emotional arousal under certain circumstances could influence several steps of the information processing and behavioral enactment process.Whereas the majority of attention has been devoted to the study of aggression (see Orobio de Castro, Veerman, Koops, Bosch, & Monshouwer, 2002), social information-processing models have also been proposed as being relevant for the understanding of peer victimization (Graham & Juvonen, 1998), childhood anxiety (Bell-Dolan, 1995;Daleiden & Vasey, 1997;Suarez & Bell-Dolan, 2001), and childhood/adolescent depression (e.g., Garber, Keiley, & Martin, 2002). Although not all withdrawn children experience anxiety and depression, social withdrawal is generally considered a symptom of internalizing problems (Achenbach & Edelbrock, 1981;Rubin, Burgess, Kennedy, & Stewart, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results along with the conclusions of Szabó and Lovibond's [42] study and Suarez and Bell-Dolan's [43] work highlight the importance of bias in information processing and its consequent distorted cognitive products (dysfunctional cognitions) as a normal phenomenon in the developmental course of children from this age group [13,28,43,44].…”
Section: Contents With Positive Valence and Characteristics Of Normatmentioning
confidence: 80%