1967
DOI: 10.1086/294974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of Actual and Predicted Sales and Profits in New-Product Introductions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the information just described, and in consultation with 3M management, we chose a 25% sales-forecast deflator to apply to all projected sales data in the analysis that follows. That deflator is consistent with 3M's historical experience and, given Tull's (1967) findings, should provide conservative sales projection figures. 2…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the information just described, and in consultation with 3M management, we chose a 25% sales-forecast deflator to apply to all projected sales data in the analysis that follows. That deflator is consistent with 3M's historical experience and, given Tull's (1967) findings, should provide conservative sales projection figures. 2…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Coller and Yoln (1998) review the literature on bias in accuracy of management earnings forecasts and find that little systematic bias occurs. Tull's (1967) model calculates $15 million in revenue as a level above which forecasts actually become pessimistic on average.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some such reasons given are overconfidence about the chances of own product success (Simon & Houghton, 2003;Tull, 1967), insufficient attention to competitive reaction (Zazac & Bazerman, 1991), and managerial ego (Schultz & Braun, 1998). Our results complement these behavioral reasons by showing how, although it may appear expost that too many firms introduced new products, the new product introduction decision of those firms could have been ex ante optimal.…”
Section: Contribution and Relationship To Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers of Mark R. Greene (1969) and Donald R. Tull (1967), where marketing risks are separated from the problems associated with common market risks and their study, deserve special attention in this respect. Marketing risk researches are practically not separable from the researches on international business risk.…”
Section: Marketing Risk -Where Did It Come From?mentioning
confidence: 99%