1997
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.28.1.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of abortion to well-being: Do race and religion make a difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(71 reference statements)
4
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and I take great satisfaction in having helped contribute to the defeat of that referendum. But again, the fact that my work (particularly Russo & Zierk, 1992;Russo & Dabul, 1997;Russo & Denious, 1998, 2001) is cited in amicus briefs and policy papers means I have become a blip on the pro-life radar screen which means I get pictures of fetus heads in the mail and my work attacked on the Web. Unfortunately, anyone can say anything on the Web with little accountability, and the pro-life forces were quick to use cyberspace to promote their cause.…”
Section: Another Trailblazer Sharedmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…and I take great satisfaction in having helped contribute to the defeat of that referendum. But again, the fact that my work (particularly Russo & Zierk, 1992;Russo & Dabul, 1997;Russo & Denious, 1998, 2001) is cited in amicus briefs and policy papers means I have become a blip on the pro-life radar screen which means I get pictures of fetus heads in the mail and my work attacked on the Web. Unfortunately, anyone can say anything on the Web with little accountability, and the pro-life forces were quick to use cyberspace to promote their cause.…”
Section: Another Trailblazer Sharedmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Unfortunately, such comparisons omit consideration of pre-existing individual differences and life events which lead to category membership. Critically, in the closely related area of abortion research, Russo and Dabul (1997) have demonstrated that wellbeing following abortion was predicted by well-being prior to pregnancy, but not by the abortion experience itself. A second shortcoming of the Main Effects Model is the untenable presumption that individuals are randomly assigned to adoption related categories.…”
Section: Main Effects Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Were one to search for the etiology of birthmother grief within an Individual Difference paradigm, one might well gather data on pre-existing individual differences in the personality or mental health of prospective birthmothers prior to relinquishment. Recall again that Russo and Dabul (1997) found that well-being following abortion was related to well-being prior to pregnancy but not to the abortion experience itself. In all likelihood, were one to combine the Main Effect and Individual Difference approaches one would account for a greater proportion of the variance, especially if non-adoption post-adoption experience also was included.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we need to advocate for equal access to reproductive health services for female adolescents that are on par with the access that adult women are provided. Social work reproductive health advocates must make themselves available to provide policy makers with accurate scientific information about the realities of adolescents' lives and circumstances (Russo & Dabul, 1997). Public health policy should be socially just, not discriminatory and oppressive, regardless of a person's chronological age.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%