2000
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2662:trilcb]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship in Lake Communities Between Primary Productivity and Species Richness

Abstract: An understanding of the relationship between species richness and productivity is crucial to understanding biodiversity in lakes. We investigated the relationship between the primary productivity of lake ecosystems and the number of species for lacustrine phytoplankton, rotifers, cladocerans, copepods, macrophytes, and fish. Our study includes two parts: (1) a survey of 33 well‐studied lakes for which data on six major taxonomic groups were available; and (2) a comparison of the effects of short‐ and long‐term… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
312
9
11

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 464 publications
(365 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
33
312
9
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, greater species richness and population abundances were observed in lakes of lower nutrient levels but higher Chl a concentrations, whereby Chl a and nutrients were generally uncorrelated among lakes (except the positive association of TKN and Chl a , see above). This finding contrasts with prior research suggesting maximum species richness at intermediate productivity [71]. Furthermore, the previous survey by [13] identified a negative association between zooplankton richness and Chl a .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, greater species richness and population abundances were observed in lakes of lower nutrient levels but higher Chl a concentrations, whereby Chl a and nutrients were generally uncorrelated among lakes (except the positive association of TKN and Chl a , see above). This finding contrasts with prior research suggesting maximum species richness at intermediate productivity [71]. Furthermore, the previous survey by [13] identified a negative association between zooplankton richness and Chl a .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term nitrogen loading decreases plant species richness (Tilman 1987) and insect richness (Haddad et al 2000) in grasslands. In lakes, a unimodal relationship is often observed between primary productivity and species richness (Dodson et al 2000), and differences in nutrient availability may cause many of these variations in primary productivity (Smith 1979). In estuaries, increased nutrient loading has also been associated with decreased benthic invertebrate richness (Valiela et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in grasslands, long-term nutrient enrichment can reduce plant and insect richness (Tilman 1987, Haddad et al 2000. Similarly, manipulations of nutrient concentrations in lakes have revealed negative associations between nutrient concentrations and phytoplankton richness (Dodson et al 2000).…”
Section: Effects Of Increased Nutrients On Stream Biotamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zooplankton richness has been previously shown to increase in response to nutrients in low productivity systems, which shift to an intermediate level of productivity when more resources are added to the system (Dodson et al 2000). Both H. gibberum and H.…”
Section: Eutrophicationmentioning
confidence: 99%