2008
DOI: 10.1080/10645570801938418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Viewing Area Size and Visitor Behavior in an Immersive Asian Elephant Exhibit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, the number of squirrels seen was affected by visit duration (positive) and noise (negative). Visitors should be encouraged to spend more time in the enclosure, either through direct advice or strategies to encourage visitors to stay longer (e.g., large viewing areas: Moss et al, ). The amount of squirrel interaction with humans increased as the number of adult visitors increased. This can be partly attributed to more opportunities for engagement and partly to a positive squirrel鈥搆eeper relationship gained via positive reinforcement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In turn, the number of squirrels seen was affected by visit duration (positive) and noise (negative). Visitors should be encouraged to spend more time in the enclosure, either through direct advice or strategies to encourage visitors to stay longer (e.g., large viewing areas: Moss et al, ). The amount of squirrel interaction with humans increased as the number of adult visitors increased. This can be partly attributed to more opportunities for engagement and partly to a positive squirrel鈥搆eeper relationship gained via positive reinforcement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One particularly intense form of visitor interaction with captive animals occurs in immersive exhibits such as walk鈥恡hrough enclosures, which are becoming increasingly common in zoos (Shani & Pizam, ). Such enclosures can be larger than traditional enclosures as the viewing area is incorporated within the exhibit rather than being adjacent to it (Moss, Francis, & Esson, ); there can also be fewer conflicts between public requirements and maintaining good welfare. For example, bats (Chiroptera) require a dark environment that can conflict with external viewing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we have adopted the tried and tested approach to quantifying visitor behavior, namely using unobtrusive observations of visitors in exhibit settings [see Serrell, 1998 for an extensive description of these techniques]. Although this method was developed in the museum studies field, it has also been widely used in wildlife attractions [Yalowitz and Bronnenkant, 2009; Zwinkels et al, 2009; Moss et al, 2008; Ross and Lukas, 2005; Ross and Gillespie, 2009; Nakamichi, 2007; Bitgood et al, 1988] increasing our confidence in the validity of implementing such an approach. Although, it must be added that the authors recognize other approaches that can be used to assess relative popularity of zoo animals, such as semantic differential scales [Sommer, 2008; Fraser et al, 2006] or conversation analysis [Clayton et al, 2009; Tunnicliffe, 1996], for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as noted in the RSPCA (2007) report, prior published research on zoos often eschews fundamental questions about zoos' abilities to deliver effective engagement of visitors with science and conservation and focuses instead on dependent (outcome) variables such as satisfaction, "stopping power," "implicit connectedness to nature," and visitor behavior within the zoo (Moss et al 2010a(Moss et al , 2010b, which are assumed to provide some proxy information about educational impact. For example, previous studies have focused on independent (causal) variables such as viewing area size (e.g., Moss et al 2008), visitor density (Moss et al 2007), relative credibility of different zoo-based personnel (e.g., Fraser et al 2008) and "identity-related motivations" (Falk et al 2007). Among those previously published studies that do focus on zoo impacts, most use postvisit only or aggregate-only data (or both), thus making it impossible to identify patterns of learning that can be validly applied at the level of the individual (Molenaar 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%