The relationship between vegetative and reproductive development in the mango in northern Australia

Scholefield, P. B.; Oag,; Sedgley, Margaret

doi:10.1071/ar9860425

Cited by 28 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 8 publications

(12 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results are in line with the finding of Thakur et al (2000), Hammam et al, (2001), El-Wakeel et al, (2006, Scholefield et al (2006), Reddy and Reddy (2009), El-Agmey (2010) Hagage (2010) and Serry (2010)…”

Section: Seed Peel and Pulp Percentagesupporting

confidence: 92%

Evaluation of Some Mango Strains under Ismailia Governorate Condition

2016

NIDOC-ASRT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

HIS INVESTIGATION was carried out during the two ……..successive seasons (2012 and 2013) on fourteen mango strains grown at Motreb Zahran orchard, Abu Sultan, Ismailia Governorate Egypt A.R.E. The studied trees were 16-year-old grown in sandy soil and irrigated with drip irrigation system. Flowering date, malformation percentage, date of fruit maturity, tree productivity and fruit quality were studied. Only three strains seem to be promising S9,S10 and S11) which they gave highest values of(productivity per tree, fruit weight, percentage of pulp weight and values of T.S.S. and lowest percentage of malformed panicles, seed weight and acidity. The evaluation indicated that, the strains as superiority can be arranged in a descending order as follows: S9, S11 and S10 may be recommended as a new superior mango cultivars.

show abstract

Section: Seed Peel and Pulp Percentagesupporting

confidence: 92%

Evaluation of Some Mango Strains under Ismailia Governorate Condition

2016

NIDOC-ASRT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This suggests that although organ development is closely related to temperature (Bonhomme, 2000;, vegetative and reproductive development in mango is, for a large part, governed by endogenous factors and not just by environmental cues. In this way, some studies on mango showed that an old GU bursts earlier (Scholefield et al, 1986) and has a higher occurrence of flowering (Scholefield et al, 1986;Davenport, 2000;Jannoyer and Lauri, 2009) than a more recent GU. It has also been shown that reiterated complexes, which are repetitions of parts or of the whole sequence of the tree architectural model (Hallé et al, 1978), have a phenology that differs from the rest of the tree (Goguey, 1997).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Deciphering structural and temporal interplays during the architectural development of mango trees

Dambreville

Lauri

Trottier

et al. 2013

Journal of Experimental Botany

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plant architecture is commonly defined by the adjacency of organs within the structure and their properties. Few studies consider the effect of endogenous temporal factors, namely phenological factors, on the establishment of plant architecture. This study hypothesized that, in addition to the effect of environmental factors, the observed plant architecture results from both endogenous structural and temporal components, and their interplays. Mango tree, which is characterized by strong phenological asynchronisms within and between trees and by repeated vegetative and reproductive flushes during a growing cycle, was chosen as a plant model. During two consecutive growing cycles, this study described vegetative and reproductive development of 20 trees submitted to the same environmental conditions. Four mango cultivars were considered to assess possible cultivar-specific patterns. Integrative vegetative and reproductive development models incorporating generalized linear models as components were built. These models described the occurrence, intensity, and timing of vegetative and reproductive development at the growth unit scale. This study showed significant interplays between structural and temporal components of plant architectural development at two temporal scales. Within a growing cycle, earliness of bud burst was highly and positively related to earliness of vegetative development and flowering. Between growing cycles, flowering growth units delayed vegetative development compared to growth units that did not flower. These interplays explained how vegetative and reproductive phenological asynchronisms within and between trees were generated and maintained. It is suggested that causation networks involving structural and temporal components may give rise to contrasted tree architectures.

show abstract

“…Eight weeks after flowering, 30 trees had branches thinned to a single fruit and girdled to isolate the fruit with 30, 60 or 120 leaves (hereafter referred to as treatment 30, 60 or 120). It was expected that the leaf:fruit ratio would remain constant within the treatments through to harvest as vegetative growth does not occur on fruiting mango terminals during fruit ontogeny (Scholefield et al, 1986). Branches were girdled by making a 10-15 mm wide cut through the bark to the cambium.…”

Section: Field Treatmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%