2021
DOI: 10.1080/1540496x.2021.1961738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Trade Liberalization and Environmental Pollution across Enterprises with Different Levels of Viability in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding indicates that strengthening environmental regulations restrains the increasing energy consumption caused by digital economy development. In addition, green technological innovations can partly moderate the negative effect of environmental regulations on haze pollution in dynamic situations (Feng et al 2021;Zheng et al 2021), and information can also improve energy efficiency (Henryson et al 2000). Therefore, technical progress eliminates the negative effect of digital economy development on GTFEE.…”
Section: Estimation Results For the Dynamic Panel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding indicates that strengthening environmental regulations restrains the increasing energy consumption caused by digital economy development. In addition, green technological innovations can partly moderate the negative effect of environmental regulations on haze pollution in dynamic situations (Feng et al 2021;Zheng et al 2021), and information can also improve energy efficiency (Henryson et al 2000). Therefore, technical progress eliminates the negative effect of digital economy development on GTFEE.…”
Section: Estimation Results For the Dynamic Panel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of the production scale is positive and significant. The more resources an enterprise has, the more likely it is to overcome the iceberg costs required for international market development (Zheng et al, 2022). More importantly, the production scale is the most critical factor hindering SME internationalization; thus, the corporate scale significantly impacts internationalization.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competitiveness of SMEs has always been an important issue in the field of management (Piperopoulos & Scase, 2009; Schaefer et al, 2023), and in the era of economic globalization, the competitiveness of SMEs is oriented toward the international market (Bilali, 2022). The international competitiveness of a company refers to its superior performance in market share, export trade, and financial performance compared to its competitors in international business operations (Moen & Servais, 2002; Peña-Vinces et al, 2017) or its ability to adapt to changes in the international market (Zheng et al, 2022). The development of digital technology has led to the increasing integration of SMEs into the global industrial division of the labor system (Zhou et al, 2022), and the international competitiveness of SMEs is an essential driving force for economic growth and residents’ well-being in developing countries (Cravo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Background and Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the new structural economic theory, technological progress that violates the advantage of factor endowment may reduce economic and environmental performances. 62,63 This means that if a city has scarce human resources and while it is strongly developing a labor-biased digital economy (such as the sharing economy) to achieve digital transformation, then the cost of developing the sharing economy cannot be effectively shared due to the lack of human resources, which inevitably reduces the positive economic and environmental performances generated by digitalization. The reverse is also true; if a city is a labor-abundant region, then it is not wise to drive a capital-biased digital transformation.…”
Section: Theoretical Mechanisms and Hypotheses’ Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%