2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between total-body mass, fat-free mass and cycle ergometry power components during 20 seconds of maximal exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation may be related to the fact that the test protocol approximates more closely to muscle contraction dynamics and contraction times associated with the sprinting tests. The results from this study are in agreement with previous work [26,27] which suggests that active muscle tissue should be used when determining resistive forces used during high-intensity cycle ergometry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This observation may be related to the fact that the test protocol approximates more closely to muscle contraction dynamics and contraction times associated with the sprinting tests. The results from this study are in agreement with previous work [26,27] which suggests that active muscle tissue should be used when determining resistive forces used during high-intensity cycle ergometry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, there are limitations to the use of the RPE scale in the current study, as the RPE scale is designed for use during (or immediately following) continuous exercise at a constant intensity and may not be a valid measure of exertion during interval based exercises, especially when values are given retrospective of the most intense exercise, as was the case in this study. RPE values obtained in this manner may underestimate exertion during the sprints; indeed, other studies where RPE has been obtained following a 20 second all out sprint have reported higher values of ~16-18 (Baker et al 2001;Gearhart et al 2005). However, we were interested in gaining an exertion measure to characterise our entire training intervention and our subjects were asked to consider the whole 10 minute exercise session when giving their ratings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…That is, P/LBM is a constant for equally trained athletes of both genders, Baker et al (2001), Maud and Schutz (1986), Sveinsson et al (2009) and Taguchi et al (2011). A fraction of the generated power, P e, is then applied to the centre of gravity of a runner with body mass m, where e is the efficiency less than or equal to one, depending on a combination of coaching, technique and equipment.…”
Section: P = Lbm Trmentioning
confidence: 99%