2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between the Uniaxial Creep Test and the Small Punch Creep Test of the AZ31 magnesium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a tremendous amount of work performed to date had also been devoted to correlate the rupture time between SPCT and uniaxial creep test using different methods, such as membrane stress method (Chakrabarty, 1970), equivalent creep strain method (Hyde et al ., 2010), and spherical and cone model (Yang et al ., 2017b) based on the semi-empirical approach to perform data interpretation. Among these approaches, such as Larson–Miller (LM), Orr–Sherby–Dorn (OSD) and Monkman–Grant (MG) relationships (Lorenzo et al ., 2014; Dobeš and Milička, 2002), LM model has the most extensive applications due to its simplicity by assuming the activation energy is dependent on the applied stress (Webster and Ainsworth, 2013). Similarly, in the work done by Dobeš and Milička (2008), a modified ratio of applied force to stress was proposed to correlate SPCT data with uniaxial creep test, and they found that the force measured from the SPCT is proportional to the stress in uniaxial creep test.…”
Section: Small Punch Creep Test Technique At High Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a tremendous amount of work performed to date had also been devoted to correlate the rupture time between SPCT and uniaxial creep test using different methods, such as membrane stress method (Chakrabarty, 1970), equivalent creep strain method (Hyde et al ., 2010), and spherical and cone model (Yang et al ., 2017b) based on the semi-empirical approach to perform data interpretation. Among these approaches, such as Larson–Miller (LM), Orr–Sherby–Dorn (OSD) and Monkman–Grant (MG) relationships (Lorenzo et al ., 2014; Dobeš and Milička, 2002), LM model has the most extensive applications due to its simplicity by assuming the activation energy is dependent on the applied stress (Webster and Ainsworth, 2013). Similarly, in the work done by Dobeš and Milička (2008), a modified ratio of applied force to stress was proposed to correlate SPCT data with uniaxial creep test, and they found that the force measured from the SPCT is proportional to the stress in uniaxial creep test.…”
Section: Small Punch Creep Test Technique At High Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%