2001
DOI: 10.1109/36.917914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between the backscattering coefficient and the biomass of narrow and broad leaf crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
102
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
12
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the accuracy of forest biometric parameter estimations is site-dependent [8,18] and affected by the forest structure [19,20], shape and dimensions of leaves and stems [21], and the ground conditions. Little is known about the backscattering characteristics of Acacia trees under a power decomposition scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the accuracy of forest biometric parameter estimations is site-dependent [8,18] and affected by the forest structure [19,20], shape and dimensions of leaves and stems [21], and the ground conditions. Little is known about the backscattering characteristics of Acacia trees under a power decomposition scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, previous studies that used SAR data for crop mapping have distinguished between "broad leafed" and "fine/narrow leaf" crops and noted the usefulness of radar data in differentiating them based on their canopy architecture [24,25]. Broad-leaved crops have higher backscatter intensity than fine-leaved crops, due to a high absorption of the radar signal in the latter [75]. In this regard, yam, which can be categorized as broad leaf, will have higher backscatter intensities than rice, which can be considered as fine leaf.…”
Section: Contribution Of Tsx Data To Crop Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the possible electromagnetic models, an incoherent RTT model was selected that was originally developed at IFAC for the simulation of agricultural crops [Macelloni et al, 2001] [Ulaby et al, 1990], and then modified for forest vegetation [ESA, 2008]. This e.m. model was developed and tested during Phase-0 of the CoReH2O mission [ESA, 2008], and was recently improved.…”
Section: The Snow-vegetation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%