1969
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
314
0
11

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(367 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
314
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Attitude is an important research topic in both advertisement and marketing as it is helpful in identifying consumer behavior in terms of brand as well as several studies were conducted in the field of social psychology (Mitchell and Olson,[20]; Eagly and Chaiken, [21]). Two dimensions of attitudes are popular: personal action tendencies relating to the brand and attitude toward the brand (Bagozzi and Richard, [22]; Ostrom and Thomas, [23]). …”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attitude is an important research topic in both advertisement and marketing as it is helpful in identifying consumer behavior in terms of brand as well as several studies were conducted in the field of social psychology (Mitchell and Olson,[20]; Eagly and Chaiken, [21]). Two dimensions of attitudes are popular: personal action tendencies relating to the brand and attitude toward the brand (Bagozzi and Richard, [22]; Ostrom and Thomas, [23]). …”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The late 1940 s saw the birth of a three-component model of attitude structure, also referred to as the tripartite model and refinement of this model continued throughout the 1950 s (Katz and Stotland, 1959) and 1960 s (Ostrom, 1969;Rosenberg and Hovland, 1960;Triandis, 1967). Smith (1947) was amongst the first to describe the components of the tripartite model in a study investigating attitudes towards Russia in 1947.…”
Section: Attitude Structure: the Unidimensional Model Vs The Tripartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early research, the three components/dimensions (henceforth, referred to as 'components' for consistency) were measured using separate scales with different response formats for each: For example, the use of a semantic differential for measurement of the cognitive component, the use of particular behaviours with a dichotomous response format for the behavioural component and a Likert response format for the affective component (indicating favourableunfavourable judgments). The use of different response formats for the attitude components in past research was due to the received view being that the three components are qualitatively different (i.e., dimensions) (Breckler, 1984;Breckler and Wiggings, 1989;Ostrom, 1969). In contrast, using the same Likert response format (favourable to unfavourable) for all three components would suggest that they are quantitatively different but not qualitatively different sources of information (because they can be measured on the same scale).…”
Section: Attitude Structure: the Unidimensional Model Vs The Tripartmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations