1984
DOI: 10.1139/b84-323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between the aboveground dry weight and diameter for a wide size range of erect land plants

Abstract: For 765 stems of plants that spanned eight orders of magnitude of aboveground dry weight (DWT) and three orders of magnitude of stem diameter (DIAM), a plot of log10DWT vs. log10DIAM was highly linear, with an r2 value of 0.997 and a slope of 2.6. The value of this slope may be related to the minimum diameters that are required by upright plants to withstand the horizontal forces of drag that arc exerted at high wind speeds. The multispecies biomass regression gave a similar estimate of the standing crop of a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The good fit of the logarithmic model in these species is not surprising, as this model has previously been shown to predict aboveground biomass accurately in a variety of woody plant species (Brown, 1976;Smith and Brand, 1983;Freedman, 1984;Buech and Rugg, 1989;Paton et al, 1998). However, the logarithmic model generally gives under-predictions, and thus a correction factor (Sprugel, 1983) to be applied in the back-transformation is given for each of the models (a 0 in Table 3).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The good fit of the logarithmic model in these species is not surprising, as this model has previously been shown to predict aboveground biomass accurately in a variety of woody plant species (Brown, 1976;Smith and Brand, 1983;Freedman, 1984;Buech and Rugg, 1989;Paton et al, 1998). However, the logarithmic model generally gives under-predictions, and thus a correction factor (Sprugel, 1983) to be applied in the back-transformation is given for each of the models (a 0 in Table 3).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The latter was estimated for trees and shrubs using equations relating above-ground dry biomass to stem diameter (Freedman, 1983;. A generalized equation was used for trees with diameter ≥6.0 cm, and another for shrubs with a diameter of <6.0 cm.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aboveground biomass for the forest was determined by measuring the diameter of all trees <' :: 5 em dbh (taken 1.4 m above ground surface) within 33 50-m 2 circular plots adjacent to but beyond the browse zone of the beaver ponds, and converting to biomass using regression equations developed by Freedman (1983). The biomass of shrubs and herbs was negligible in comparison to tree biomass and was not measured.…”
Section: Site Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%