2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02397.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Surface Temperature, Tissue Temperature, Microbubble Formation, and Steam Pops

Abstract: MBII correlated better with surface temperature than with tissue temperature; steam pops, on the other hand, correlated better with tissue temperature. MBII was an insensitive marker of steam pops and surface temperature in excess of 80 degrees C. Therefore, MBII should not be used to titrate RF power.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, even when not intending to deploy higher energy, it is often the case that sufficient energy is deployed to result in a steam pop. Steam pops occur when tissue temperature exceeds 100 °C, and in fact, experimental measurements have found tissue temperatures of 102 ± 17 °C reached during steam pop formation [22]. Steam pops are common when cooled electrode temperature exceeds 40 °C and are not predictable from power or impedance drop, but small impedance rises and sudden drops in measured electrode temperature indicate possible steam formation [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, even when not intending to deploy higher energy, it is often the case that sufficient energy is deployed to result in a steam pop. Steam pops occur when tissue temperature exceeds 100 °C, and in fact, experimental measurements have found tissue temperatures of 102 ± 17 °C reached during steam pop formation [22]. Steam pops are common when cooled electrode temperature exceeds 40 °C and are not predictable from power or impedance drop, but small impedance rises and sudden drops in measured electrode temperature indicate possible steam formation [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of clinical application, it is especially important that both models should accurately predict the lesion surface width and the maximum blood temperature achieved around the electrode tip, since it is known that these parameters are related to thrombus formation [ 1 , 13 , 14 ]. It is also important that they be able to predict the maximum temperature in the tissue, since values of around 100 °C are associated with the formation of steam pops [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although measuring contact force has been suggested as a way of limiting force delivery and subsequent steam pops, in the recent TOCCATA study there were audible pops in 16% of cases; however, the force at which the pops occurred was not stated. In an earlier animal study, there was an increased incidence of steam pops at higher contact force; 13 however, steam pops could occur at low force, and contact force was not predictive of steam pops. In contrast, US is able to accurately demonstrate steam formation prior to a potential pop, and if power delivery is terminated, intramyocardial steam can dissipate within the tissue without venting to the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…11 During the steam pop, gas is vented from the myocardium to the tissue surface, which tends to displace the catheter tip, leading to a rise in impedance. 7 Numerous studies in addition to the data presented in this study have demonstrated that changes in impedance during ablation and at the time of the steam pop are poorly correlated with the ability to either predict or detect steam pops, 7,9,[11][12][13] which ultimately can lead to cardiac tamponade, 2 the leading cause of death due to AF ablation. 5 Intracardiac echocardiography has been suggested as a possible way to prevent steam pops by observing the formation of microbubbles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%