2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Structural Characteristics of Organization and Followed Business Strategy: An Application in Denizli

Abstract: Over the years, strategy and structure have represented two important constructs that captured the interest of researchers in the business field. This research explores the relationship between organizational structure and business strategy. We hypothesized that several dimensions of organizational structure (centralization, formalization, size, and complexity) would influence perceptions of prospector, defender, analyzer and reactor strategy. We retrieved the data used in this study from the Denizli Chamber o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, organisational theorists have examined the main relationship between strategy and structure, structure and performance and the link among strategy, structure and performance (Nandakumar et al, 2010). The overall inferences drawn conclude that organisations must match structure and processes if the essence of business strategy is to achieve organisational goals (Bozkurt et al, 2014). However, the relationship between strategy and performance is inconclusive and is moderated by many other organisational constructs.…”
Section: Organisational Characteristics and Performancementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, organisational theorists have examined the main relationship between strategy and structure, structure and performance and the link among strategy, structure and performance (Nandakumar et al, 2010). The overall inferences drawn conclude that organisations must match structure and processes if the essence of business strategy is to achieve organisational goals (Bozkurt et al, 2014). However, the relationship between strategy and performance is inconclusive and is moderated by many other organisational constructs.…”
Section: Organisational Characteristics and Performancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Competitive strategy is mainly the outcome of the pattern of decisions made by managers to guide an organisation on how to compete in the hypercompetitive business environment, by adding value to the processes that can influence organisational performance (Bozkurt et al, 2014;Acquaah and Agyapong, 2015). This study considers Porter's generic typology as the dominant paradigm of competitive strategy (see Tansey et al, 2014;Ho, 2015).…”
Section: Competitive Strategy and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisational frameworks can be classified into various dimensions such as centralised (mechanistic), decentralised, integrated, flat, tall, formal, specialised, complex (organic), simplified, and matrix based on scholars and management practitioners over time (Wahba, 2015;Daft et al, 2010;Bozkurta et al, 2014;Talbert & Hall, 2009). The most significant types of the organisational framework are centralised, decentralised and formalised (Talbert & Hall, 2009;Daft et al, 2010;Shaar & Khattab, 2015).…”
Section: Organisational Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (Hage, 1965;Wahba, 2015), a centralised organisational framework denotes the organisation's decision-making authority. In a centralised framework, decisions and power are retained by top management and opportunities for growth is slim (Wahba, 2015;Daft et al, 2010;Bozkurta et al, 2014;Talbert & Hall, 2009). The share of work assortment and employees who partake in the decision process and the decision areas are also insignificant.…”
Section: Organisational Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation