2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2015.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between skull morphology, masticatory muscle force and cranial skeletal deformation during biting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
53
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, despite an overall weak relationship between muscle force and skull shape in humans, individuals with an orthognathic maxilla have larger temporalis muscles and thus higher muscle forces than prognathic individuals (Toro‐Ibacache et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, despite an overall weak relationship between muscle force and skull shape in humans, individuals with an orthognathic maxilla have larger temporalis muscles and thus higher muscle forces than prognathic individuals (Toro‐Ibacache et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An FE model of the cranium of a male human aged 43, with full dentition, was built from segmented CT data used in previous studies (Toro‐Ibacache et al, ; Toro‐Ibacache et al, ), where muscle CSAs were also directly measured. The image data comprise a medical CT scan of a living patient taken at the Teaching Hospital of the University of Chile (Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancellous bone was omitted, and hence all bone was modelled as a solid material with a Young's modulus of 17 and 50 GPa for teeth, both with a Poisson's ratio of 0.3. This model building approach has been used in previous studies of cranial FE models (Wroe et al, ; Bright and Gröning, ; Fitton et al, ; Jansen van Rensburg et al, ; Toro‐Ibacache et al, ) and is relevant in cases where model resolution, fossilization or taphonomic processes do not allow to accurately model cancellous bone (Bright and Gröning, ; Fitton et al, ; Toro‐Ibacache et al, ), or when models are generated via 3D surface warping (O'Higgins et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations