DEDICATIONThe decision to dedicate this dissertation to the 100e of my life, my seven year old son, Noah Nathanid, was by t~lr the easiest part of my entire doctoral process. Noah, being the precocious and generous boy that he is, selflessly sacrificed cOlll1tlL'SS hours of "daddy" tin1l~ so that I could write, revise, revise, revise, and finalize my dissertation. My new life goal is to repay him in kind with coulltless hours of movies, bowling, and as much scooter time as any parent can bear.11:1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I acknowledge and thank my dissertation co-chair, Dr. J'-,Iamok Choi, for her patience, high standards, wisdom, integrity, encouragement, and maternal nurturance throughout this difficult process. I discovered that \\Titing a dissertation is replete with emotive highs and lows. Dr. Choi was always there to celebrate the joyous moments with a huge smile and praline5. She \vas just as \villing, hmvever, to share her box of Kleenex when the process seemed nothing less than insurmountable. Thank you Dr. Choi. I hope I made you proud. This dissertation represented an examination of the interrelationships between psychological gender (i.e., masculinity, femll1inity. androgyny, and undifferentiated), biological gender (i.e., male and female). g\?nder role conflict, self-esteem, and loneliness in a sample of gay men and lesbian women. Psychological gender and biological gender served as the independent variables in the ~,1:Udy while gender role conflict, self-esteem, and loneliness served as the dependent variables. A two-way t~lctorial MANOY A was used as the statistical model of choice in addition to conelationalanalyses. A confirmatory factor analysis was also comrleted on the instrument used to measure gender role conflict, the Gender Role Conflict Scale.The dissertation \vas divided into five chapters. The first chapter simply served as an introduction to the study including the variables, definitions, and research questions.Chapter two introduced the literature relevant to th,~ study. The literature relatiye to psychological gender \\'as presented in chronological order, follO\ved by a V1 discussion of the literature addressing self-(.~steern, loneliness. and gender role contlict.Chapter three described the purpose and design of :he current study in addition to all research instruments used. Research instruments included the Bern Sex Role Inventory as the measurement instrument of psychological gender. The RosenbcTg Self-Esteem Scale and the Revised UCLA l.oneliness Scale wcre used to measure self-esteem and loneliness. respectively. Finally, the Gender-Role Conflict Scale \vas used to measure levels of gender role conflict.The study results were presented in chapter four. No signiticant interaction was found between psychological gender and hiological gender on gender role contlict., selfesteem, or loneliness. Significant main effects. however, were observed in psychological gender on all dependent variables. In addition, a significant main effect was observed in biological gender Oil gender role confli...