1997
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between Self-Rating of the Effects of alcohol and alcohol challenge results in ninety-eight young men.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
148
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
148
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher scores on the SRE indicate that more drinks are required to have an effect, implying a lower level of response per drink. SRE values have correlated with data from alcohol challenge studies at about 0.4 to 0.6 (Schuckit et al, 1997a(Schuckit et al, , 1997b and have correlated with the ALDH2*2 allele at 0.35 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Higher scores on the SRE indicate that more drinks are required to have an effect, implying a lower level of response per drink. SRE values have correlated with data from alcohol challenge studies at about 0.4 to 0.6 (Schuckit et al, 1997a(Schuckit et al, , 1997b and have correlated with the ALDH2*2 allele at 0.35 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Prior evaluations of the alcohol challenge results have demonstrated the most robust relationship between LR and alcoholic outcome among those who fell in the low end of the distribution, where LR explained approximately half of the relationship between family history and alcoholic outcome Smith, 1996, 2000). In addition, the highest correlation between SRE and alcohol challenge scores was observed when data from those clearly high and low on SREs were evaluated (Schuckit et al, 1997b). In viewing results it is important to remember that a low LR on alcohol challenge involves a less intense reaction at a given blood alcohol concentration, whereas the similar result on the SRE reflects the need for a higher number of drinks to obtain a particular effect from alcohol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These data used a simple paper-and-pencil test that measured LR through self-reports of the number of drinks required for an effect. This instrument has a 1 year retest reliability of 0.8 and, depending on the cutoff score used, has been reported to successfully identify up to 80% of the individuals who demonstrated the lowest intensity of response to alcohol on alcohol challenges (Schuckit et al, 1997b). Thus, the ease of administration of this measure and the availability of a moderately sized sample for whom both SRE data and genome scan results were available made this a logical focus of the present analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two scores were generated, one for the approximate fi rst fi ve times of drinking (the SRE5) and the other the number of drinks for effects averaged across the fi rst fi ve times, the period of heaviest drinking, and the most recent 3 months (the SRET) (Ray et al, 2011;Schuckit et al, 1997b). This instrument, with a Cronbach's α > .90 and 12-month to 5-year reliabilities between .6 and .8, recorded the number of standard drinks required for fi rst feeling effects, slurring speech, impairing coordination, and passing out.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%