The relationship between self-perceived personality andimpression management on the neo-ffi

Scandell, Donald J.; Wlazelek, Brian

doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00230-x

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other tests use direct and transparent self-ascriptions of traits. Evidently, there is a moderately strong overlap between scores obtained on the NEO-FFI and such self-ascriptions (Scandell & Wlazelek, 1999). The IAT measures the automatic self-ascription of a given trait, so-to-speak, "explicitly" because that trait is presented in an unveiled fashion and throughout the IAT on the computer screen.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the Implicit Association Test Immune to Faking?

Steffens

2004

Experimental Psychology

311

243

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the main advantages of measures of automatic cognition is supposed to be that they are less susceptible to faking than explicit tests. It is an empirical question, however, to what degree these measures can be faked, and the response might well differ for different measures. We tested whether the Implicit Association Test (IAT, Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) cannot be faked as easily as explicit measures of the same constructs. We chose the Big-Five dimensions conscientiousness and extraversion as the constructs of interest. The results show, indeed, that the IAT is much less susceptible to faking than questionnaire measures are, even if no selective faking of single dimensions of the questionnaire occurred. However, given limited experience, scores on the IAT, too, are susceptible to faking.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the Implicit Association Test Immune to Faking?

Steffens

2004

Experimental Psychology

311

243

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Second, several research studies indicate that the elevations in mean domain scale scores are affected by response bias, altering the overall profile and, in effect, decreasing the interpretative accuracy and utility of the NEO PI-R profile. Individuals who underreport or attempt to present themselves in an overly positive light tend to score significantly lower on Neuroticism and higher on Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness domain scales relative to individuals who approach the instrument in a more straightforward manner; a reverse pattern of domain scale elevations emerges for individuals overreporting psychological difficulties or otherwise attempting to create a negative impression (Bagby & Marshall, 2003;Ballenger, Caldwell-Andrews, & Baer, 2001;Berry et al, 2001;Caldwell-Andrews, Baer, & Berry, 2000;Furnham, 1997;Paulhus et al, 1995;Reid-Seiser & Fritzsche, 2001;Rosse, Stecher, Miller, & Levin, 1998;Scandell & Wlazelek, 1999; see Topping & O'Gorman, 1997;see Sellbom & Bagby, in press, for a review).…”

Section: Response Bias and Instrument Validity And Utilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Validity and Utility of the Positive Presentation Management and Negative Presentation Management Scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory

Sellbom

Bagby

2008

Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Schinka, Kinder, and Kremer developed "validity" scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae) to detect underreporting-the Positive Presentation Management (PPM) Scale and overreporting-the Negative Presentation Management (NPM) Scale. In this investigation, the clinical utility of these scales was examined using the established validity scales from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher et al.) as the referent. The sample was composed of 370 psychiatric patients who completed the NEO PI-R and the MMPI-2 as part of a routine evaluation. Results indicated that response distortion compromised the utility of the NEO PI-R domain scales. Moreover, the PPM and NPM scales and an NPM-PPM index significantly differentiated invalid under-and overreporting groups from a valid responding group. The PPM and NPM-PPM index were adequate in classifying under- and overreporters, respectively.

show abstract

“…This instrument has been successfully used in numerous investigations of personality (e.g. Scandell & Wlazelek, 1999;Whiteman, Bedford, Grant, Fowkes, & Deary, 2001).…”

Section: Neo Five-factor Inventory (Neo-ffi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The assessment of behavioural activation—the relationship between positive emotionality and the behavioural activation system

Quilty

Oakman

2004

Eur J Pers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much personality research suggests that the variance in personality can be accounted for by a few dimensions, often hypothesized to be connected to neurological circuits. Gray's (1982) behavioural activation system (BAS) and behavioural inhibition system (BIS) in particular propose to explain for a variety of behaviour. This investigation sought to determine whether Positive Emotionality is an appropriate measure of the BAS, and how Tellegen's (1985) constructs are related to BAS activity. Measures of BAS and Positive Emotionality were administered to undergraduates. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that, while Positive Emotionality can be used as an indicator of BAS activity, it is better conceived of as a distinct, correlated construct. In addition, not all components of Positive Emotionality were related to BAS activity, and BAS was further related to components of Negative Emotionality and Constraint.

show abstract

The relationship between self-perceived personality andimpression management on the neo-ffi

Cited by 12 publications

References 15 publications

Is the Implicit Association Test Immune to Faking?

Is the Implicit Association Test Immune to Faking?

The Validity and Utility of the Positive Presentation Management and Negative Presentation Management Scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory

The assessment of behavioural activation—the relationship between positive emotionality and the behavioural activation system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About