The Relationship between Science and Religion: Complexity Rules the Day, and Many Windows and Maps Are Needed

Kowalski, Charles J.

doi:10.22158/jrph.v1n1p59

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…NOTES a. Both the many maps and windows metaphors were shown to be important in the study of the relationship between religion and science 52 . The relationship between R&S is complex given that it depends both on time and place and on the interaction between these two factors.…”

Section: Closing Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives on the Role of Triangulation in Medicine and Health Care

Kowalski

Mrdjenovich

Redman

2023

MRAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We consider the use of triangulation— the idea that we should examine a given phenomenon from a number of angles to get a “rounded appreciation” for the phenomenon in question— in health care. Viewing triangulation itself from a number of perspectives (e.g., related approaches, philosophical underpinnings, examples of applications), we argue that some form of triangulation will often prove useful to the researcher and clinician, though the approach has limitations and which form, if any, should be used in a given situation depends on context.

show abstract

Section: Closing Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives on the Role of Triangulation in Medicine and Health Care

Kowalski

Mrdjenovich

Redman

2023

MRAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is more in line with our thesis that the "war" is between scientism and religious fundamentalists. Much of the current thunder on this front pits the so-called "New Atheists" and religious extremists (Kowalski, 2018). Thus, Principe (2015) cites "the rise of the celebrity scientist", as an important development in the "science wars".…”

Section: Scientismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anti-Scientific Currents in American Thought

Kowalski¹,

Mrdjenovich²

2019

JRPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multifarious forces have surrounded science and continue their—sometimes separate, sometimes coordinated—attempts to supplant a scientific approach to an explanation of important questions about us and the world we inhabit. We focus here on questions pertaining to biology and medicine, but no aspect of the scientific enterprise is immune from attack; and not all of the forces aligned against it are represented. The ones considered are: religion, neoliberalism, postmodernism, the “back-to-nature” movement, bioethical obstructionism, and the current POTUS, Donald Trump. We sit in amazement that at the amount of vitriol that has been leveled at science, but try to maintain civility in response. We would be irenic, not polemic; promoting true dialogue between respected scholars holding somewhat differing views. This is not as difficult as some would have you believe.

show abstract

The Relationship between Science and Religion: Complexity Rules the Day, and Many Windows and Maps Are Needed

Abstract: In a recent paper, Kowalski and Mrdjenovich (2017)

Cited by 2 publications

References 31 publications

Perspectives on the Role of Triangulation in Medicine and Health Care

Perspectives on the Role of Triangulation in Medicine and Health Care

Anti-Scientific Currents in American Thought

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About