2023
DOI: 10.6018/analesps.518001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between psychological distress, meaning in life, and life satisfaction in the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the fear of being infected, losing relatives, and measures taken to prevent contamination (e.g., lockdowns, quarantining, spatial distancing, etc.) have all increased the risk of depression, anxiety and stress. In the present study, the relationship between psychological distress, meaning in life, and life satisfaction was explored among individuals who were infected and not infected with COVID-19 during the pandemic. The present study is the first to examine these variables simul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows the descriptive frequency statistics of the Stress scale among students. Regarding the stress scale, almost 34.4% of students resulted in a range from (0-1) scores, and are considered normal stress, 19.6% of students are classified as "hardly ever" stress with a range of scores (15-18), 18.8% of students are classified as "occasionally stress" with a range of scores (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), 14.6% are classified with "almost always stress" with range scores (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) and only 12.6% of students are classified "always stress" in COVID-19 time with range score (+34). Additionally, Table 5 shows descriptive frequency statistics of the PHQ COVID-19 Scale among 472 students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 shows the descriptive frequency statistics of the Stress scale among students. Regarding the stress scale, almost 34.4% of students resulted in a range from (0-1) scores, and are considered normal stress, 19.6% of students are classified as "hardly ever" stress with a range of scores (15-18), 18.8% of students are classified as "occasionally stress" with a range of scores (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), 14.6% are classified with "almost always stress" with range scores (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) and only 12.6% of students are classified "always stress" in COVID-19 time with range score (+34). Additionally, Table 5 shows descriptive frequency statistics of the PHQ COVID-19 Scale among 472 students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Table 5 shows descriptive frequency statistics of the PHQ COVID-19 Scale among 472 students. Based on 9 items of PHQ-9 calculation questions, most of the students 43.3% reflect depression in normal scores (0-4), 33.9% of students reflect depression in mild scores (5-9), 15.3% of students reflect depression in moderate scores (10-14), and 7.5% of students reflect depression in severe scores (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Figure 1 shows the mental health burden among students of the University, while Figure 2 shows the mean scores of all scales by gender which means that females are more stressed, they fear more from COVID-19 and also, they have a higher level of anxiety and depression than males.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sample size selection was guided by similar, prior survey-based study designs [ 38 , 45 , 46 ]. Post-hoc sample size estimation [ 47 ], using the conservative parameters of 5% margin of error, 50% response distribution, and a 99% confidence interval, suggested a minimum N of 643 was adequately powered to detect modest effect sizes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%