2011
DOI: 10.1080/15017419.2011.596649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between prospective memory, working memory and self-rated memory performance in individuals with intellectual disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular in real world attention has to be switched from the ongoing activity to the intended PM task without a direct request to remember (McDaniel & Einstein, 2000) which is difficult in the ID group (Meilan et al, 2009). Previous results based on performance in laboratory settings show severe limitations in PM function in individuals with ID (Levén, Lyxell, Andersson, Danielsson, & Rönnberg, 2011;Meilan et al, 2009). Weak working memory and episodic memory are offered as explanations (Levén et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular in real world attention has to be switched from the ongoing activity to the intended PM task without a direct request to remember (McDaniel & Einstein, 2000) which is difficult in the ID group (Meilan et al, 2009). Previous results based on performance in laboratory settings show severe limitations in PM function in individuals with ID (Levén, Lyxell, Andersson, Danielsson, & Rönnberg, 2011;Meilan et al, 2009). Weak working memory and episodic memory are offered as explanations (Levén et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A Picture Position Span Task (Levén et al, 2011) was used to tap working memory capacity (Just & Carpenter, 1992; range: 0-60 pictures recalled in the correct position; for details see Levén et al, 2011). Photos of persons (difficult to verbalise; Smyth et al, 2005) were presented one by one (1 s, inter-stimuli interval 0.075 s).…”
Section: Working Memory Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%