2014
DOI: 10.1097/01.asw.0000437641.22278.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Pressure Ulcer Prevalence, Body Mass Index, and Braden Scales and Subscales

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether any of the Braden subscales were more strongly related to pressure ulcer occurrence than the Braden total score in obese and nonobese hospitalized patients. The authors investigated whether defining high risk for the total Braden score of 16 or less was associated with pressure ulcer occurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research revealed that high‐risk patients (10–12) were more likely to have a pressure ulcer than extreme‐risk patients. Similarly, Pokorny, Rose, and Watkins () reported that patients with a Braden score ≤16 were more likely to develop a pressure ulcer than those with a Braden score ≤ 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This research revealed that high‐risk patients (10–12) were more likely to have a pressure ulcer than extreme‐risk patients. Similarly, Pokorny, Rose, and Watkins () reported that patients with a Braden score ≤16 were more likely to develop a pressure ulcer than those with a Braden score ≤ 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Five interventional studies were related to Objective 1 (Atrous et al, 2021; Ghezeljeh et al, 2017; Powers, 2016; Rose et al, 2022; Sutton et al, 2013). Five case studies (Dambaugh & Ecklund, 2016; Spike, 2018; Tammellero, 2011; Tatusov et al, 2017; Temple et al, 2017), two qualitative studies (Barakat‐Johnson et al, 2019; Hales et al, 2018) and two mixed methods studies (Tanneberger & Ciupitu‐Plath, 2018; Walker et al, 2019) were related to Objective 2 and 28 quantitative studies— to Objective 3 (Amini et al, 2022; Buffon et al, 2022; Capasso et al, 2022; Carson et al, 2018; Coyer et al, 2014; Ditillo et al, 2014; Drake et al, 2010; Gardiner et al, 2014; Grap et al, 2019; Großschädl & Bauer, 2022; Hobson et al, 2017; Hyun et al, 2014; Kayser et al, 2019; Kottner et al, 2011; Litcherfeld‐Kottner et al, 2020; Mananzo et al, 2014; Miller et al, 2016; Ness et al, 2018; O'Brien et al, 2014; Pokorny et al, 2014; Qaddumi & Almahmoud, 2019; Raff et al, 2016; Swanson et al, 2011; Tracy et al, 2020; VanGilder et al, 2010, 2021; Verekova et al, 2020; Workum et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nineteen studies totalling over 1 million patients found no association between BMI ≥ 30 and pressure injury occurrence (Amini et al, 2022; Buffon et al, 2022; Capasso et al, 2022; Gardiner et al, 2014; Großschädl & Bauer, 2022; Hobson et al, 2017; Kottner et al, 2011; Litcherfeld‐Kottner et al, 2020; Mananzo et al, 2014; Miller et al, 2016; O'Brien et al, 2014; Pokorny et al, 2014; Qaddumi & Almahmoud, 2019; Raff et al, 2016; Swanson et al, 2011; VanGilder et al, 2010, 2021; Verekova et al, 2020; Workum et al, 2022). Lastly, Coyer et al (2014) found 8 out of 15 patients who developed a medical device‐related pressure injury had a BMI ≥ 30, with nearly half being mucous ulcers, no skin ulcers, but with no p ‐value or odds ratio reported for this finding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations