2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02229.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between possum density and browse damage on kamahi in New Zealand forests

Abstract: To minimize the impacts of introduced pests and to justify and prioritize pest control, managers need to know the relationship between pest density and damage. This relationship can be difficult to quantify because pest impacts can be highly variable. In New Zealand, introduced brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) browse a wide range of native forest species. However, possum browse is extremely patchy making it difficult to quantify the relationship between density and damage, meaning the benefits of redu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional data were collected to characterize foraging patterns at a local scale because previous studies found significant site differences in possum impacts (Duncan et al . ). The experimental design included measurements of tree size using diameter at breast height (DBH), local availability of other food sources and possum browse at the patch scale (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additional data were collected to characterize foraging patterns at a local scale because previous studies found significant site differences in possum impacts (Duncan et al . ). The experimental design included measurements of tree size using diameter at breast height (DBH), local availability of other food sources and possum browse at the patch scale (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gill and Morgan, 2010;Innes et al, 2010;Ricciardi et al, 2013;Thiele et al, 2010), which can mask important relationships between pest abundance and impact, especially in variable environments. This is exemplified by the high spatial and temporal variability in browsing impacts of invasive brushtail possums in New Zealand forest ecosystems (Duncan et al, 2011;Holland et al, 2013;Sessions and Kelly, 2001). Duncan et al (2011) were able to account for this variation using a hierarchical modelling approach that incorporated heterogeneity at multiple levels (sites, times, individual trees), and Holland et al (2013) used a mechanistic model to generate site-specific DIFs using the type of data routinely collected by management agencies.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Utility Of Density-impact Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exemplified by the high spatial and temporal variability in browsing impacts of invasive brushtail possums in New Zealand forest ecosystems (Duncan et al, 2011;Holland et al, 2013;Sessions and Kelly, 2001). Duncan et al (2011) were able to account for this variation using a hierarchical modelling approach that incorporated heterogeneity at multiple levels (sites, times, individual trees), and Holland et al (2013) used a mechanistic model to generate site-specific DIFs using the type of data routinely collected by management agencies. Managers can therefore mitigate the problem of variability by using local knowledge to their advantage, and deriving DIFs for their system, using adaptive experimental management approaches (e.g.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Utility Of Density-impact Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) was introduced in the 19th century from Australia, and spread rapidly through forests nationwide. removal and consumption of foliar mass) by possums is highly variable in space and time, even among individual trees of the same species (Duncan et al 2011). As with many herbivores (Bulinski & McArthur 2003;Rafferty et al 2010), browse damage (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sweetapple et al 2004;Forsyth & Parkes 2005;Nugent et al 2010;Duncan et al 2011), and is defined as the proportion of sky occluded by foliage when looking up at the canopy from beneath the tree (Payton et al 1999). Sweetapple et al 2004;Forsyth & Parkes 2005;Nugent et al 2010;Duncan et al 2011), and is defined as the proportion of sky occluded by foliage when looking up at the canopy from beneath the tree (Payton et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%