2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between pitch and space in congenital amusia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research results considering this association are somewhat contradictory: congenital amusics may have lower than average abilities in visuospatial processing (Douglas and Bilkey, 2007) but this effect has not been replicated (Tillmann et al, 2010; Williamson et al, 2011). In the present study the hypothesis was investigated by creating a visuospatial task that was analogous to the Scale subtest of the MBEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research results considering this association are somewhat contradictory: congenital amusics may have lower than average abilities in visuospatial processing (Douglas and Bilkey, 2007) but this effect has not been replicated (Tillmann et al, 2010; Williamson et al, 2011). In the present study the hypothesis was investigated by creating a visuospatial task that was analogous to the Scale subtest of the MBEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, congenital amusics have been found to have below average performance in a mental rotation task (Douglas and Bilkey, 2007), although this finding has not been replicated (Tillmann et al, 2010). Williamson et al (2011) found that a subgroup of amusics were slower but as accurate as the control group in the mental rotation task, but did not find any group differences in a range of other visuospatial tasks. Douglas and Bilkey (2007) also found that the stimulus-response compatibility effect was not as strong in amusics as in the control group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…People with amusia (i.e., an impaired ability to discriminate pitch) have corresponding spatial deficits in some reports (Douglas & Bilkey, 2007), but others have failed to replicate the association (Tillman et al, 2010;Williamson, Cocchini, & Stewart, 2011). People have been found to map musical pitch to vertical spatial locations (Pratt, 1930;Rusconi, Kwan, Giordano, Umiltà, & Butterworth, 2006), but they are also willing to map it to psychophysical luminosity and loudness (Hubbard, 1996;McDermott, Lehr, & Oxenham, 2008), and to words denoting emotion, size, sweetness, texture and temperature (Eitan & Timmers, 2010;Walker & Smith, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study was aimed to investigate the involvement of the cerebellum in the association between spatial and musical domains because this structure appears to play a role in visuo-spatial as well as musical perception. Since in previous studies mental rotation tasks have been used to test for a correlation between spatial and musical abilities [16], [17], in the present research we tested the performances in mental rotation (MR) tasks of healthy adult subjects passively listening Mozart’s Sonata K.448 in the presence or in the absence of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) applied to the left cerebellar hemisphere. Although bilateral cerebellar activations have been observed in both musical [6] and mental rotation tasks [18], to transiently down-regulate the neuronal excitability [19], [20] the cTBS was applied on the left hemisphere, because the activation of left lateral crus I is reported to be associated with the presentation of auditory stimuli [21], [22] and during mental rotation tasks [10], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%